|
Expenditures /CIP Projects
<br />As indicated previously, the CIP significantly reflects the program approved by the City
<br />Council last year. However, four new projects have been added to the programs that affect
<br />expenditure level. Including these four new projects, a summary comparison of all
<br />expenditures by project category is shown in the following table
<br />Comparison of Project Expenditures
<br />Fiscal Years 2000 -01 through FY 2003 -04
<br />Detailed project description sheets for each of the new projects are included at the end of this
<br />section; however, a brief description of the projects is as follows:
<br />Tri- Valley Transportation Development (TVTD) Fee Reserve ($450,000/Streets/
<br />FY 2000 -01). This reserve is established is anticipation of identifying projects funded
<br />with the TVTD fees. Public Works will be reviewing appropriate uses for these funds
<br />during the next fiscal year.
<br />Storm Drain and Parking Lot Improvements at 157 Main Street ($150,000/
<br />Miscellaneous/FY 2000 -01). This project will address problems with flooding in the
<br />rear parking lot and replace deteriorated pavement at 157 Main Street.
<br />Median Renovations ($200,000/Parks/FY 2000 01). This project will renovate
<br />medians at Sports Park Drive, Alameda Drive, and Mathew Court. Funding for these
<br />projects is from the Park Renovation Fund.
<br />Sports Park Softball Field Repairs ($25,000/Parks/FY 2000 -01). This project makes
<br />necessary improvements to the playing infields at the Sports Park Softball Complex
<br />infields.
<br />As part of the Mid Term CIP process, staff solicited input from all City Commissions
<br />regarding the status of currently funded projects. In general, the Commissions were satisfied
<br />59
<br />As Projected
<br />in CIP
<br />Amended
<br />Mid -Term
<br />Change
<br />Change
<br />Streets
<br />$20,618,073
<br />$21,068,073
<br />2.18%
<br />$450,000
<br />Parks
<br />$5,788,640
<br />$6,013,640
<br />3.89%
<br />$225,000
<br />Miscellaneous
<br />$15,976,971
<br />$16,126,971
<br />0.94%
<br />$150,000
<br />Water
<br />$6,715,609
<br />$6,715,609
<br />0.00%
<br />$0
<br />Sewer
<br />$5,384,422
<br />$5,346,922
<br />-0.70%
<br />$37,500
<br />Total
<br />$54,483,715
<br />$55,271,215
<br />1.45%
<br />5787,500
<br />Expenditures /CIP Projects
<br />As indicated previously, the CIP significantly reflects the program approved by the City
<br />Council last year. However, four new projects have been added to the programs that affect
<br />expenditure level. Including these four new projects, a summary comparison of all
<br />expenditures by project category is shown in the following table
<br />Comparison of Project Expenditures
<br />Fiscal Years 2000 -01 through FY 2003 -04
<br />Detailed project description sheets for each of the new projects are included at the end of this
<br />section; however, a brief description of the projects is as follows:
<br />Tri- Valley Transportation Development (TVTD) Fee Reserve ($450,000/Streets/
<br />FY 2000 -01). This reserve is established is anticipation of identifying projects funded
<br />with the TVTD fees. Public Works will be reviewing appropriate uses for these funds
<br />during the next fiscal year.
<br />Storm Drain and Parking Lot Improvements at 157 Main Street ($150,000/
<br />Miscellaneous/FY 2000 -01). This project will address problems with flooding in the
<br />rear parking lot and replace deteriorated pavement at 157 Main Street.
<br />Median Renovations ($200,000/Parks/FY 2000 01). This project will renovate
<br />medians at Sports Park Drive, Alameda Drive, and Mathew Court. Funding for these
<br />projects is from the Park Renovation Fund.
<br />Sports Park Softball Field Repairs ($25,000/Parks/FY 2000 -01). This project makes
<br />necessary improvements to the playing infields at the Sports Park Softball Complex
<br />infields.
<br />As part of the Mid Term CIP process, staff solicited input from all City Commissions
<br />regarding the status of currently funded projects. In general, the Commissions were satisfied
<br />59
<br />
|