My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
072109
>
20 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 12:03:38 PM
Creation date
7/14/2009 12:00:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/21/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
20 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gregg Hall, Legacy Partners Commercial, LLC, referred to the letter from their <br /> attorneys, Cox, Castle Nicholson, LLP, which noted that several issues that were <br /> raised in their earlier letter dated November 24, 2008 were not responded to in the <br /> revised Draft General Plan or Final EIR. He requested that the Commission consider <br /> retaining the existing zoning in East Pleasanton until such time that the Specific Plan is <br /> adopted. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Commissioner Blank referred to Chapter 5, Public Safety Element, Program 9.1 on <br /> page 5 -38, and inquired if it requires the City to provide defibrillators in public buildings <br /> and educate the public in their use. <br /> Mr. Roush stated that the Program simply states "Provide defibrillators in public <br /> buildings and educate the public in their use." He noted that it does not stipulate that <br /> they should be provided in all public buildings and that there is some discretion as to <br /> which public buildings. <br /> Commissioner Blank inquired if it would be more appropriate to say "some" public <br /> buildings. <br /> Mr. Roush replied that he would interpret that as not all public buildings must have <br /> defibrillators. <br /> Commissioner Blank further inquired questioned if the educational part is required. <br /> Mr. Roush replied that to educate the public is a fairly vague term and that there could <br /> be materials or instructions provided. He added that there is no formal education <br /> process where people will take a class; this is dependent upon how important it is to the <br /> City Council in terms of what the educational program might look like. <br /> Commissioner Blank indicated that he respectfully disagreed with this. <br /> Commissioner Blank then referred to Program 13.2 regarding the installation of <br /> automatic fire sprinklers and explained why he believed they were necessary. <br /> Commissioner Narum stated that she sees Program 13.3 on page 5 -39 as providing the <br /> Planning Commission cover for when it requires sprinklers in new construction, which is <br /> not a current ordinance. She noted that she understands from Program 13.2 on <br /> page 5 -39 that the fire sprinkler system will be adopted as a City ordinance, which is <br /> what the Planning Commission wants. She added that she believed Program 13.3 <br /> would allow the Commission to continue what it is doing and that there needs more <br /> focus to get Program 13.2 implemented and put the adopted ordinances in place. <br /> Commissioner Blank referred to Policy 21 on page 5 -42 regarding working with the City <br /> of Livermore regarding air navigational hazards. He stated that the City of Livermore <br /> EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 13, 2009 Page 2 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.