My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
072109
>
20 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 12:03:38 PM
Creation date
7/14/2009 12:00:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/21/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
20 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LIVE eo E LETTER 16 I <br /> December 5, 2008 r <br /> Janice Stem, Principal Planner Ni6EuVME) <br /> Corrmunity Development Department DEC 1 ?00Q N <br /> City of Pleasanton EE <br /> P.O Box 520 eN <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566 PLANNING OIVISION <br /> Dear Ms. Stern: <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact <br /> Report (EIR) for the update of the Pleasanton General Plan, The City of Livermore has the <br /> following comments: <br /> 1. On page 3.1 -6, second full paragraph, please note that land uses in the southwestern <br /> portion of Livermore include residential uses as well as neighborhood commercial, <br /> agricultural and viticulture uses. It is correctly noted that the unincorporated area <br /> between Livermore and Pleasanton is outside of Livermore's Urban Growth Boundary <br /> (UGB) and is Included in Livermore's General Plan Planning Area. However, it <br /> should also be noted that this area is within Pleasanton's Sphere of Influence (SOI). <br /> i, References to Regional Rail Plan on page 3 -38 in General Plan and on 3.2.8 in EIR <br /> should be updated. MTC adopted Regional Rail Plan in September 2007. Related to 15.1 <br /> Regional Rail, the High Speed Rail Program EIR was certified in August 2006 and <br /> recommended commuter service enhancements for the Altamont Corridor. A project <br /> specific EIR has begun to study alternatives. <br /> 2. Circulation Element Policy 5, which exempts Gateway Intersections from the City's <br /> standard of LOS 0, causes a potentially significant Impact that has not been <br /> adequately analyzed or disclosed In the Draft EIR. Although mitigations have been <br /> proposed in the DEIR that would achieve LOS D or better at the Gateway <br /> Intersections, the policy would exempt the intersections from LOS standard and <br /> therefore, provide no assurance that the proposed mitigations would ever be <br /> constructed by the City or required of the City or a developer to mitigate <br /> environmental impacts of specific capital improvements or development projects The <br /> EIR shows that if no improvements are done, the Buildout LOS at many of the <br /> Gateway Intersections would be LOS F, including the intersections of Stanley /EI <br /> Charro and Et CharroiStoneridge, which are of particular concern to Livermore. <br /> However, the impact of the potential of LOS F at Gateway Intersections has not been <br /> adequately disclosed. In particular. the effect of LOS F on queuing and safety has not <br /> been addressed. LOS F at Gateway Intersections could result in severe traffic <br /> congestion and/or safely problems due to queuing on major arterial roadways, at <br /> L <br /> El .ril 1.252 ..:Iili I.I',IIIU'IL :1 rat. I_I III ,'1.':1 45i 1 ,r•.., rrn •..._I c. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.