Laserfiche WebLink
THE CITY OF 13 <br /> ~i e. ATTACHMENT 2 <br /> pLEASANTON® <br /> Date: May 1, 2009 <br /> To: Mayor and Members of the City Council <br /> From: Office of the City Attorney <br /> Subject: Supplemental Agenda Report Concerning the Appeal of the Planning Commission's <br /> Decision to Deny the Tentative Map Application for the Vineyard Villa Mobilehome <br /> Park <br /> Summary <br /> On the Council's regular agenda for May 5, 2009 is an agenda report concerning an appeal of the <br /> Planning Commission's decision to deny the tentative map application that would allow the Vineyard <br /> Villa Mobilehome Park to be converted to "residential ownership For the reasons expressed in that <br /> agenda report, staff recommends that the appeal be granted and therefore the application, with <br /> conditions, be approved. The purpose of this supplemental report is to recommend that Council, in <br /> addition to approving the application, take action to: add a condition to extend the term of the current <br /> Rent Stabilization Agreement to 2025; support legislation that would strengthen local control over <br /> mobilehome conversions; and support other public entities' litigation efforts to exercise more local <br /> control over mobilehome conversions. <br /> 1. Extending the term of the current Rent Stabilization Agreement. <br /> In 2007 the City Council approved a Rent Stabilization Agreement with the owner of the Vineyard Villa <br /> Mobilehome Park. In general terms, it limits the park owner to raise rents annually to a cost of living <br /> index, but with a floor of 2% and a ceiling of 5 The Agreement has a five year term but also provides <br /> that if the Council approves the residential conversion, the term would be extended for five additional <br /> years, i.e., through December 2017. <br /> Under existing state law concerning residential conversions, once lots begin to be sold, local rent control <br /> regulations are abrogated in favor of state law provisions. Those provisions provide that as to <br /> households that qualify as lower income households (currently, two person households earning less than <br /> $53,000 annually would qualify as lower income), the park owner could raise rents no more than the <br /> average of cost of living increases over the previous four years. Hence, lower income households that <br /> choose not to purchase their lots will continue to have rent control protection even after conversion. For <br /> households that do not qualify as lower income households (and choose not to purchase their lots), the <br /> state law provisions allow the park owner to raise space rents to "market but over a five year period. <br /> Here, the owner has agreed that if the application is approved, he will not begin selling the lots for at <br /> least 10 years; through at least 2017, rents would continue to be controlled through the current Rent <br />