Laserfiche WebLink
Memo October 15. 2010 <br /> An ending date is more problematic as there is nothing recorded that can be used to define the <br /> end date. There are 3 possibilities: <br /> • The date expenditures for the project were suspended by the District and final payments <br /> were made to close out the project—February 20, 1999 (FYE 1999 for simplicity). <br /> • The date when City and District entered into the "Third Supplemental Agreement" in <br /> which the District agreed not to proceed with CWR without the written approval of the <br /> District—November 19, 2002 (FYE 2003 for simplicity sake). <br /> e The date of agreement to conduct the audit—FYE 2009 for simplicity sake. <br /> The portion of Regional Connection Fees attributable to each service area for each time period is <br /> shown in Table 2 below. <br /> Table 2 —Alternative Time Periods <br /> Time Period District Pleasanton Total <br /> FYE 1996 to 1999 $19,414,000 63.6% $11,108,000 36.4% $30,522,000 <br /> FYE 1996 to 2003 $54,477,000 73.5% $19,612,000 26.5% $74,089,000 <br /> FYE 1996 to 2009 $82,306,000 72.0% $32,064,000 28.0% $114,370,000 <br /> EXPENDITURE AUDITS SUMMARY <br /> Schematics of the treatment and pumping facilities and a map of the pipeline segments discussed <br /> in this summary follow in the body of the Expenditure Audit (Attachment 3). The total audited <br /> expenditure for CWR project is $21,141,387 as summarized in Table 3. There are four(4)boxes <br /> of project records that the audit was based upon that are available for review. <br /> This product is not a"financial"audit but is an engineering analysis of the costs incurred in completing the project. <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> H:d NGDEPTDcpi ItomsENGMGR PlasanmMCWR Audi0Final CWR Eapmditum-Income Audit Mcmo.doc <br />