My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES PHASE OUT
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
LONG TERM AGREEMENT
>
D
>
DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES PHASE OUT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2015 1:32:47 PM
Creation date
12/4/2009 10:42:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - DOCUMENT DATE
5/30/1978
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - NAME
DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES PHASE OUT
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - TYPE
WATER SERVICES AGMT
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - RECORD SERIES
704-06 (Long Term Agreements)
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - DESTRUCTION DATE
PERMANENT
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - NOTES
AMENDMENTS ALSO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGREEMENT <br /> THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 7 day of <br /> September 1978, by and between the CITY OF PLEASANTON, a municipal <br /> corporation (hereinafter referred to as CITY), and DUBLIN SAN RAMON <br /> SERVICES DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as DISTRICT), amends the <br /> May 30, 1978 agreement between the CITY and DISTRICT. <br /> RECITALS <br /> This agreement is predicated upon the following facts: <br /> WHEREAS, CITY and DISTRICT entered into an agreement on <br /> May 30, 1978 (hereinafter called Agreement) in order to provide <br /> for phaseout of CITY's Sunol sewer treatment plant and to increase <br /> the DISTRICT's sewer treatment plant capacity to provide for con- <br /> solidation with the CITY; and <br /> WHEREAS, existing litigation between the DISTRICT and Volk <br /> McLain Properties, Inc., and Volk- McLain Communities, Inc. (Collec- <br /> tively hereinafter referred to as Volk- McLain), entitled "Valley <br /> Community Services District v. Volk- McLain Communities, Inc., et al, <br /> and Volk- McLain Properties, cross- complainant v. Valley Community <br /> Services District, cross defendant," No. 441299 in the Superior <br /> Court of the State of California in and for the County of Alameda, <br /> presently on appeal, makes the implementation of the Agreement <br /> impractical due to the resulting uncertainty of future costs to <br /> the CITY for future connections; and <br /> WHEREAS, paragraph 14 (3)(d) of the Agreement allows that <br /> either party may void the agreement if there is not a satisfactory <br /> settlement between the DISTRICT and Volk- McLain; and <br /> WHEREAS, the DISTRICT and Volk- McLain, with the CITY partici- <br /> 9, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.