Laserfiche WebLink
2. Work Program <br /> in the planning and program development that has taken place to date. ESA <br /> will work closely with City staff, and engage public input into the planning <br /> process to develop a suite of GHG reduction measures that address the <br /> particular needs of the City and maximize the City's potential for increased <br /> sustainability. <br /> We will draw on tools, ideas and experience from many sources, including <br /> ICLEI, the US Conference of Mayors Best Practices for Climate Protection, <br /> StopWaste, CoolCalifomia.org, and our experience developing CAPs for <br /> local governments in California and beyond, including the cities of Hayward, <br /> San Leandro, Martinez, Sunnyvale, and Irvine. We will also draw from best <br /> practices put forth in exemplary CAPs such as those produced by the Bay <br /> Area cities of Berkeley, Hayward, San Francisco, and Menlo Park. We will <br /> consider programs and policies that are both wholly within the City of <br /> Pleasanton and those that are regional in nature, and that would require <br /> collaboration with other jurisdictions and regional organizations, such as <br /> ABAG. <br /> From the literature review, City staff direction, and our own consideration of <br /> Pleasanton's needs and potentials, we will develop a long -list of programs <br /> and policies. We will then conduct a comparative evaluation to develop a list <br /> of measures best - suited for Pleasanton that address each major emissions <br /> source. <br /> For each suitable measure, we will prepare an approximately 1 -page <br /> description that includes the following elements: <br /> • Program Description; <br /> • Related City and regional programs and policies; <br /> • Emissions category affected; <br /> • Strategies for implementation, including assessment of effort, potential <br /> barriers, and suitability as an "early action" program; <br /> • Implementation timeframe, typical "payback" period (if applicable) and <br /> expected participation rates; <br /> • GHG reduction potential, in terms of carbon dioxide equivalence (CO <br /> • Co- benefits, including benefits to communities most at risk from adverse <br /> impacts of climate change; <br /> • Estimated cost (both construction and annual operating /staffing if <br /> applicable); <br /> • <br /> • <br /> 2 -10 City of Pleasanton Climate Action Plan <br />