My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
120710
>
18 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2010 11:07:57 AM
Creation date
12/1/2010 1:00:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/7/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 5 <br /> PUD -82, David DiDonato, Donato Builders, Inc. <br /> Application for Planned Unit Development Rezoning of an approximately 1.17 - <br /> acre site located at 4171 and 4189 Stanley Boulevard from R -1 -6,500 (One - Family <br /> Residential) District to Planned Unit Development — High Density Residential <br /> (PUD -HDR) District and for Development Plan approval to construct 14 detached <br /> single - family homes. <br /> Steve Otto presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key elements <br /> of the project. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he took issue with a comment made regarding the <br /> Commission not being clear about density. He indicated that he had read the Minutes; <br /> all five Commissioners expressed concern about density, and four of the five <br /> Commissioners recommended removal of a unit or a significant reduction in floor area <br /> ratios (FAR). <br /> Mr. Otto agreed that the Commission concurred about reducing the FAR; however, with <br /> respect to density or the number of units, he understood from his reading of the Minutes <br /> that some Commissioners did support the proposed density. <br /> Mr. Dolan added that intensity would be measured by the FAR and that density is <br /> measured as units per acre. <br /> Commissioner Blank noted that the number of units is the same and it appears that with <br /> respect to the house sizes, Plan 1 has been reduced by 10 square feet, and Plan 2 has <br /> been reduced by 32 square feet. He inquired if staff considers this to be a significant <br /> enough reduction to make a real impact, given the number of Plan 1 and Plan 2 units <br /> and only one unit of Plan 3. <br /> Mr. Otto replied that staff did not feel there was an exact number that the homes had to <br /> be reduced by. He added that staff agrees that the square footage of the first two <br /> models was not reduced substantially; however, the third model which was originally <br /> over 2,000 square feet has been reduced to 1,920 square feet. <br /> Commissioner Blank corrected his earlier statement that there was only one unit of <br /> Plan 3; he noted that there are three Plan 3 units. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that there had been a lot of discussion and concern <br /> from the Commission and the public regarding parking. He inquired if parking would be <br /> an issue if everything were done according to the proposal. He further inquired how the <br /> City would police the parking and the restriction of not utilizing garages for storage. <br /> Mr. Otto replied that ideally, the City would not police the parking or garage use. He <br /> stated that it would be included in the requirements of the CC &R's and recorded with <br /> the properties, and the residents themselves would take care of it. He added that there <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 15, 2010 Page 1 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.