18 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Otto indicated that the condition could be modified to add the verbiage "in plain language" and to address the possible impacts of whistles and vibration. Commissioner Pearce requested confirmation that there are 20 trees, including 12 heritage trees, which are proposed for removal, that the trees intended to be preserved are the two along in the Union Pacific Railroad corridor, that the project is not subject to the inclusionary housing ordinance because it has less than 15 units, and that, therefore, in -lieu fees will not be paid. Mr. Otto stated that Commissioner Pearce's tree figures were correct and added that if the project were at 15 units or more, the developer would be required to provide at least 20 percent of the units at the affordable level. Chair Olson commented that as far as marketability, he could see healthy seniors who can climb stairs and walk to the Downtown, as well as a young family, wanting to purchase the homes. Commissioner Blank moved to find that there are no new or changed circumstances or information which would require additional CEQA review of the project and that the proposed PUD rezoning and development plan are consistent with the General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan; to make the PUD findings for the proposed development plan as listed in the staff report; and to recommend approval of Case PUD -82, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A of the staff report, with the modifications that: (1) the applicant work with staff to determine the tree species that would ensure appropriate tree sizes and to maximize shading; (2) the fencing material be con -heart redwood; (3) plain language be utilized in the disclosures and restrictive covenants; and (4) train whistle noise and vibration be included in the train disclosure. Commissioner O'Connor suggesting including for the record that the project fits with the zoning and Specific Plan for the Downtown Specific Plan as amended a couple of years ago, and that the Pleasanton Downtown will see higher density housing going forward. Commissioner Blank noted that the applicant was very articulate when he stated that these types of infill projects are tough. He indicated that he likes the idea that, while technically not affordable housing, these units may be affordable. Commissioner O'Connor agreed, stating they may be considered affordable by design because of the number of units that can be developed per acre. Chair Olson added that Downtowns do better with higher densities. Commissioner Blank inquired if there were any concerns by staff regarding the construction duration of the project, such as constructing the houses in phases, and any impacts it may have on the surrounding neighborhoods. EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 15, 2010 Page 7 of 9