My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
120710
>
18 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2010 11:07:57 AM
Creation date
12/1/2010 1:00:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/7/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 6 <br /> From: Emilie <br /> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 6:02 PM <br /> To: Steve Otto <br /> Subject: re: PUD 82 David Di donato <br /> I am a homeowner at 4145 Stanley Blvd. I have several objections to the proposed development to be located at 4171 <br /> and 4189 Stanley Blvd. <br /> First is parking. Our street is already impacted by a lack of parking. Once the street is modernized and utilities <br /> undergrounded there will be parking at all on the South Side of the Street. How are you, the city going to enforce that all <br /> residents will park in their garages. There are only 5 guest parking lots. What if just one resident has a party? Where will <br /> people park? I believe there should be one guest parking space for each house. <br /> The second is type of housing. I believe there is a need in Pleasanton for more affordable housing. The proposed <br /> development is for single family homes. We need more types of developments that feature smaller lots and homes for <br /> seniors and low income residents like the senior apartments, condos and mobile home park that are already in the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> The third objection I have is the complete razing of all of the tall heritage trees. I noticed that the planning commission <br /> allows for the developer to pay for trees to be built elsewhere in the city to compensate for those trees lost in our <br /> neighborhood. That is not a fair trade for the residents on Stanley Blvd. We need the trees in our neighborhood to <br /> provide oxygen, shade and filter out the particulates created by the train and traffic along Stanley Blvd. I request that the <br /> trees be saved or the same number general types of trees be planted inside the development. This may decrease the <br /> number of housing units, but large trees are crucial to preserving the neighborhood for the people and wildlife that live on <br /> our street. <br /> Please do not hesitate to contact me. I will be calling you to hear your response to my objections. <br /> Emilie Cruzan <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> 9/14/2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.