My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2011 4:54:04 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 2:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/10/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Referring to the bottom of page 21 of Exhibit A, Hacienda TOD Standards and Design <br /> Guidelines, Chair Narum asked Mr. Williams what "enhanced private and public open <br /> space landscaping" means. <br /> Mr. Williams replied that this refers to setbacks. He indicated that it is more difficult to <br /> do a quality landscape when there are tighter setback spaces between a hardscape and <br /> a building. He explained that the alternatives are either providing additional open space <br /> somewhere to give an open landscape sense or enhancing the landscaping such that it <br /> mitigates the fact that there is a tight setback. He stated that the guideline leaves it <br /> open so the design team can work with staff to ensure there is a high enough quality <br /> level in the landscape to mitigate the tighter setback. <br /> Chair Narum inquired if the intent was clear enough for a developer reading this. <br /> Mr. Williams replied that he believes it is relatively clear. He stated that more <br /> clarification might be necessary if this were to be implemented throughout the entire <br /> City or a larger area of development; however, this is for one particular street, one <br /> landscape piece, where everyone will understand the intent. <br /> Commissioner Blank referred to the parking designs on Owens Drive and inquired what <br /> the term "a lesser design" meant, as opposed to a different design. <br /> Mr. Williams presented the entire Owens Drive frontage of the property and its existing <br /> curb. He stated that instead of having a bulb -out and holding the existing curb line, the <br /> preferred solution would be to continue with diagonal parking all the way across the <br /> frontage to the new crossing. He indicated that there has been some concern that this <br /> portion of the site may create some difficulty in accommodating the overall 30 dwelling <br /> units per acre, or with modifying this portion of the street. He explained that it could be <br /> a cost factor or the loss of a potential development site, as opposed to adding about <br /> '/ acre of development potential by reducing the setbacks. <br /> Commissioner Blank inquired if the first alternative is the preferred alternative and what <br /> the Task Force prefers. <br /> Mr. Dolan said yes. He explained that "lesser" also means `less change." He noted <br /> that the second alternative allows for retaining the existing curb line for a great deal of <br /> distance and does not require the median to be moved, which the first alternative does. <br /> Referring to Parcel 1, Commissioner Pentin inquired if the four models were based on a <br /> 29 -foot or 22 -foot setback on Willow Road. <br /> Mr. Williams replied that a 29 -foot setback was utilized. <br /> Commissioner Pentin further inquired if these types of buildings could still fit within the <br /> space under the guidelines with the 29 -foot setback on Willow Road and 10 -foot <br /> setback on the opposite side. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 5 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.