My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2011 4:54:04 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 2:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/10/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
> Streetscape and off -site access improvements; <br /> > District parking structures for replacement and /or shared parking; <br /> > Incremental costs of off - street structured or underground parking for developments; <br /> > Infrastructure upgrades (water /sewer, etc.); <br /> • Affordable and mixed - income housing development; <br /> > Costs associated with increased accessibility throughout multi -level construction; <br /> > Commercial /mixed -use development (e.g. ground floor local- serving retail space in <br /> advance of market viability); and <br /> > Land acquisition or parcel assembly and land banking. <br /> THE ROLE OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES <br /> Historically, cities in California have formed redevelopment agencies have used tax <br /> increment finance (TIF) to upgrade their infrastructure, assemble land, and attract new <br /> private development to "blighted" areas. Although this redevelopment process offers a very <br /> powerful potential funding source for TOD, there are three reasons why it is problematic to <br /> rely on redevelopment as the sole mechanism for overcoming the funding gaps associated <br /> with TOD: <br /> (1) The primary goal of redevelopment is to eliminate blight, but not all blighted areas are <br /> also served by fixed- guideway transit or high- frequency bus, so there is not always <br /> an overlap between redevelopment project areas and transit station areas. Many TOD <br /> and infill opportunities are located in more suburban locations, including the parking <br /> lots of transit stations in outlying counties, where redevelopment is not a policy option. <br /> Other redevelopment project areas are focused in older industrial districts or low- income <br /> neighborhoods that are only marginally served by regional transit systems. <br /> Oakland's Uptown Project: Opening Fall 2008 <br /> The Uptown District in Oakland is in the midst ofa renaissance built on the redevelopment of several blocks. The <br /> Uptown Apartments, currently under construction, will include 665 rental apartments. 133 units (20 %) will <br /> be affordable to households earning under 50% of Area Median Income (AMI) with 33 units (5 %) affordable <br /> to households earning up to 120% AMI. 9,000 square feet of retail along Telegraph Avenue and there will be <br /> a new 25,000 square foot public park. The Uptown Apartments project has received over $54 million from <br /> the Oakland Redevelopment Agency and other City funding sources. These hinds include assistance with <br /> site acquisition, property tax abatement, and hazardous materials abatement, as well as funding for off -site <br /> improvements and the public park. <br /> Several more planned projects, including a 100% affordable, 80 -unit apartment building and a high -rise <br /> apartment building will add to the neighborhood revitalization effort. New restaurants and small businesses are <br /> starting to flourish, and many adjacent property owners have begun to rehabilitate their buildings. <br /> Barriers to 70D and Regional Funding Needs 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.