Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable Mayor Hosterman and Members of the Council <br /> February 10, 2011 <br /> Page 2 <br /> project can work, both physically as to fitting the product on the site to meet the required <br /> density of the Core Guidelines, and make the project economically feasible. <br /> 1. Setbacks. Don Reber successfully explained to the Task Force, and we explained at <br /> the Planning Commission. that there is a problem fitting 30 units per acre onto Parcels 1 <br /> and 2 with housing types (tuck under and garden style) that are economically feasible to <br /> build and still meet the setback requirements of the Guidelines. At one edge of each <br /> parcel the Guidelines anticipate a trail, on the street side edge of each parcel the <br /> Guidelines anticipate deep suburban setbacks, and internal to the projcct we have open <br /> space requirements whici are unusually high for a TOD setting. At the Planning <br /> Commission hearing we explained that we cannot meet the Guidelines standards if both <br /> the trail and the setbacks remain un- amended. The Planning Commission expressed their <br /> preference to preserve the trails and approved reduced setbacks as follows: <br /> - Willow Drive: 20 feet not 22 feet. <br /> - Hacienda: 25 feel not 35 feet. <br /> - Gibraltar: 20 feet not 25 feet. <br /> BRE is fine with the obligation to build the trail from Owens Drive, along the eastern <br /> property line of parcels 1 and 2 with the trail terminating at Hacienda Drive. Building that <br /> trail is not our issue. Again, our concern is that we arc physically constrained from <br /> building the trail and complying with the setback requirements of the Guidelines as un- <br /> amended. From our point of view, the proposed street setbacks are so deep as to undercut <br /> the new urbanist look of the project. We believe the Planning Commission <br /> recommendation is actually an improvement to the TOD project, provides needed <br /> certainty, and is essential to having an economically feasible project. <br /> We don't believe that the proposed trail that encumbers the west side of Parcel 2 serves <br /> any purpose from a practical standpoint. In order for folks who might live in housing on <br /> Parcel 3 to access that trail they will have to cross Gibraltar Drive midblock. Their <br /> preferred path of travel will more likely take them to the BART station via either the Iron <br /> Horse Trail or the sidewalks along Willow Rd. <br /> 2. Gibraltar Retail /Live Work. To move beyond the debate that has been going on <br /> since the Task Force was formed, BRE agreed to having the entire Owens Drive frontage <br /> be retail and live -work space. We accept this obligation with knowledge that similar <br /> existing TOD retail in Dublin and Pleasant Hill has remained vacant since being built. In <br /> the case of Dublin, the Avalon Bay project located at the BART station has not leased <br /> any square footage of its ground floor retail in close to four years of effort. We believe <br /> that the Pleasant Hill BART project also remains 100% vacant after nearly a year of <br /> operation. We are certain in our position that retail space and live -work space anywhere <br /> on our projects will be difficult to lease, chronically vacant, and a financial drain on the <br /> project. Again, in order to move the Guideline process along to completion we conceded <br /> the point for the requirement on Parcel 1. <br />