12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines Initial Study Carbon Dioxide (CO 21.19 28.1 + 33 % Source: Illingworth & Rodkin, using Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov. 2006, 2007. In 2005, ozone was the only pollutant for which the Bay Area was in non - attainment. It is anticipated that in the future the Bay Area will be in non - attainment for particulate matter. Because the proposed project is adoption of Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines, no construction would occur as a result of this project. At the time a development plan is considered for any of the three project sites, the City will conduct environmental analysis under CEQ1A to consider the potential for carbon monoxide, ozone, and particulate air quality impacts due to project construction and operation, and will identify mitigation measures, as warranted. The project site exceeds 4.0 acres. Thus an enhanced dust control program during construction would be applicable to development resulting from this project. Future development consistent with the TOD Standards and Design Guidelines may locate residential development within 1,000 feet of the 1 -580 Freeway. A health risk assessment would be required for development proposed as of May 1, 2011. Residential development resulting from the proposed zoning change would not generate objectionable odors; some automobile exhaust odors from on -site vehicles could be expected but would have a less than significant environmental irnpact. Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than No Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Impact Incorporation Impact 4. Biological Resources — Would the project: a) 11 ave a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? h) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian X habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish anc_ Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally X protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any X native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances X protecting biological resources, such a; a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Draft, Subject to Revision 10 2/11/2011