My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
25
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
081611
>
25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2011 1:54:51 PM
Creation date
8/10/2011 1:13:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/16/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
25
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Harryman explained that the difference is that the PUD zoning for the property <br /> states that this type of use is allowed with a Conditional Use Permit, but VBP's private <br /> CC&Rs state that this kind of use is allowed subject to the approval of the Architectural <br /> Review Board, which did not approve it. She added that the City only looks at its own <br /> zoning provisions and applies those. <br /> Considering if this application were called a tutoring facility, Chair Narum inquired if the <br /> Longshore Tutoring Center had a Use Permit at that site and whether it could be used <br /> by Summer Time Learning Center. <br /> Ms. Amos said yes. <br /> Ms. Stern added that the application would need to be consistent with all the conditions. <br /> She indicated that she is not certain if Longshore Tutoring Center had age limitations <br /> either. <br /> Ms. Amos noted that Longshore Tutoring Center's hours of operation were different and <br /> it had a greater number of students that would be there. She continued that the ages of <br /> the children were different as well; the students were not as young, and some actually <br /> went to high school. She indicated that there was also a bit of difference in terms of <br /> their business practices. <br /> Chair Narum inquired if Longshore Tutoring Center had more than the 15 students <br /> maximum. <br /> Ms. Amos replied that there is no maximum number of students for this specific PUD. <br /> She explained that the maximum number of students for straight-zoning designation <br /> sites without a Conditional Use Permit is 20. She added that it is different for PUDs, <br /> where a Conditional Use Permit is required no matter the number of students. <br /> Chair Narum inquired if she remembers how many students Longshore Tutoring Center <br /> was permitted to have. <br /> Ms. Amos replied that she believes it is 40. <br /> Ms. Stern added that staff felt there might be some additional conditions the <br /> Commission may want to apply for this younger age group. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> Bryan Bowers stated that he is the building owner with his family, and his wife, Summer, <br /> is the applicant. He indicated that they wanted to open up the learning center for the <br /> summer to fill the need at the time for the Pleasanton area, since most of the summer <br /> school programs have incurred budget cuts. He stated that they looked at the zoning <br /> and saw that it was a Conditional Use. He noted that they attempted to get an approval <br /> from the VBP Owners Association, and when he talked to the Board, the members <br /> expressed concern over the safety of the children. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, JUNE 8, 2011 Page 2 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.