11 ATTACHMENT 04 - Laserfiche WebLink

The Commission considered Question #1 and Question #2 together. 1. Is the proposed density acceptable? 2. Should a minimum of 15 units be built in order to require affordable housing units be constructed per the City's Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance? Commissioner O'Connor stated that he previously supported this density but is now having second thoughts. He indicated that he understands that the plan for the Downtown is to have more density, but he thinks this is too tight. He noted that there will be a shortage of parking with the revamping of Stanley Boulevard. He added that while the project includes 23 covered and 26 uncovered parking spaces, the reality is that people do not park in their garages, and there is not enough guest parking for visitors. He suggested more on-site parking, more open space, and the elimination of one more unit. He indicated that he would not support increasing the density. Commissioner Pentin stated that he would not support increasing the density and likes the removal of the one unit [from 14] in order 10 increase the parking and possibly the tot lot, but he would much prefer it another unit were removed. Commissioner O'Connor added that depending on which unit is removed, some of the trees might also be saved. Commissioner Blank stated that he supported the original configuration, but after having heard some of the public testimony and reviewing the materials received, he thinks the project should be brought down to 12 total units, which would be the elimination of an additional unit. He noted that this would allow for additional open space, more trees, and perhaps less shading issues on the PV panels. He indicated that he was not supportive of 15 units on the property Commissioner Pearce stated that she supported a reduction in density and more open space but that she thinks there could be 15 units ii they were not single-family homes. She noted that the staff report states that retaining some of the cedar trees limits the space to install play equipment, and if the project is that tight, then some of the units need to be removed. She indicated, however, that given discussions at the Housing Element Task Force regarding the need for affordable lousing, she would not be opposed to 15 non-single-family homes with decreased living space and increased open space. Chair Narum stated that she supported 13 units but believes the floor area ratio (FAR) is too high and suggested decreasing the size of the homes in order to increase rear yard setbacks. Commissioner Pearce suggested a significant house size decrease, as the developer may return with ten square feet less off of each home. EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 11 of 18