My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 4:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Garbarino stated that she wanted to clarify for the Commission that there are <br /> actually 14 older homes on Old Stanley Boulevard that are over 50 years old which are <br /> in relatively good shape. Sde noted that there used to be more but they have been <br /> demolished thoughtlessly. She added that there are other homes that have been built <br /> to echo some past historic look, but they all look new. She indicated that those owners <br /> are also quite concerned about the density of this project and voiced the difficulty in <br /> driving slowly by the neighborhood. She noted that there are a couple of contractors in <br /> the audience and inquired whether they might want to speak about how much it would <br /> cost to rehabilitation the ho ase slated for demolition. <br /> Ms. Cruzan requested the Commission to consider the 15-foot setbacks on the east <br /> side for the neighbors because of the fact that homes will be two stories and a ten-foot <br /> setback is not very far. She cited the uniqueness of the area and invited the <br /> Commissioners to visit the neighborhood. She concluded that she would appreciate <br /> anything the Commission can do to preserve the home. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that she thinks the discussion was very productive. She <br /> agreed with Commissioner Pentin's comments about the Commission striving for <br /> balance and while she is not opposed to the developer developing the property, she <br /> would like balance in the fir al decision. <br /> Chair Narum asked for feedback regarding the 15-foot setbacks. <br /> The Commissioners felt that the new plan could address the setbacks. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he thinks with two less units, there will be more <br /> preservation of trees. He added that the entire open space does not necessarily have <br /> to be one lot in the center; he would love to see either more space between units for a <br /> single-family development, or alternatively, more usable space in the backyards of <br /> attached homes. <br /> Commissioner Blank commented that the first home he moved into was 1 ,000 square <br /> feet on a tiny lot with a tiny backyard and an attached garage in front. He stated that he <br /> had minimum lot lines on both sides of his property, but this was their home. He <br /> commented that there does not seem to be many of these types of homes in <br /> Pleasanton. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he would like to see a 10- or 11-unit development, but <br /> every time a unit is removed and the lots as well as the tot lot are made bigger, the price <br /> of the homes is significantly raised. He noted that they are either legally affordable <br /> housing or $800,000 housing and cited the need for something well below that range so <br /> that new families can afford; to live in the City. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 17' of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.