Laserfiche WebLink
Tree Preservation Report, 4171 &4189 Stanley Blvd. Ed Brennan, Consulting Arborist <br /> January 9, 2009 Page 4 <br /> Each tree was rated for suitability for preservation based upon its age, health, <br /> structural condition and ability to safely coexist within a development environment <br /> (see Tree Survey for suitability ratings for individual trees). <br /> Table 3: Tree Suitability for Preservation <br /> Good These are trees with good health and structural stability that have the <br /> potential for longevity at the site. Six(6)trees were rated as having good <br /> suitability for preservation. These include three (3) Deodar cedars, the <br /> Canary Island date palm, a coast live oak, and a Douglas fir. <br /> Moderate Trees in this category have fair health and/or structural defects that may <br /> be abated with treatment. Trees in this category require more intense <br /> management and monitoring, and may have shorter life-spans than <br /> those in the "good"category. Thirteen (13) trees were rated as having <br /> moderate suitability for preservation. These include four(4) Calif. black <br /> walnuts, two (2)each of almond and glossy privet, and one (1)each of <br /> coast live oak, English walnut, Italian stone pine, lime, orange, and valley <br /> oak. <br /> Poor Trees in this category are in poor health or have significant defects in <br /> structure that cannot be abated with treatment. These trees can be <br /> expected to decline regardless of management. The species or <br /> individual tree may possess either characteristics that are undesirable in <br /> landscape settings or be unsuited for use areas. Four(4) trees were <br /> rated as having poor suitability for preservation. These included two (2) <br /> English walnut, one (1) Calif. black walnut, and one(1)fruitless <br /> mulberry. <br /> Evaluation of Impacts and Recommendations for Preservation <br /> Appropriate tree retention develops a practical match between the location and intensity of <br /> construction activities and the quality and health of trees. The Tree Survey was the <br /> reference point for tree condition and quality. Potential impacts from construction were <br /> evaluated using the Site Plan and the Stanley Blvd. Concept exhibit, prepared by Camp & <br /> Camp Associates, Walnut Creek. <br /> Potential impacts from construction were estimated for each tree. The most significant <br /> impacts to the trees would occur as a result of the grading and construction of the new <br /> residences, driveways, landscape installations, and trenching for underground utilities. <br /> Based on my analysis of the project, I recommend removing the four(4)trees rated as poor <br /> in suitability for preservation, and 17 trees whose locations conflict with the site plan (Table <br /> 4). The two(2)off-site trees, #69 and 70, could be preserved. Preservation of these trees is <br /> predicated on establishing a Tree Protection Zone and other preservation activities <br /> described in the Tree Preservation Guidelines that follow. <br />