My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 4:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT J <br /> PUD-82, David DiDonato Donato Builders, Inc. <br /> Work Session to review and receive comments on a proposal to construct <br /> 13 detached single-family homes on an approximately 1.17-acre site located at <br /> 4171 and 4189 Stanley Bculevard. Zoning for the property is R-1-6„500 <br /> (One-Family Residential) District. <br /> Steve Otto presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key elements <br /> of the proposal. <br /> Commissioner Blank noted that the list of questiors did not include the noise issue. <br /> Mr. Otto explained that information or the noise issue, such as the train, would be <br /> presented at the next meeting. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he reviewed his own property's deed of trust and <br /> disclosures and noted that the train and railroad tracks were disclosed on three pages in <br /> verbiage that could not be understood by a common lay person. He commented that <br /> disclosures should be written in plain language. He then inquired what could be done if <br /> noise from the train is at 60 dBA. <br /> Chair Narum suggested that this issue be added as Question #12. She added that <br /> there was a noise and vibration study report in the reading materials which provided <br /> information on noise inside the house. <br /> Mr. Otto stated that the report indicated what mitigation would be required in order to <br /> meet the General Plan standards inside the homes. He added that as discussed in the <br /> prior staff report, it does not address the train whistle or horn noise. <br /> Commissioner Blank indicated that he specifically was concerned about the whistle and <br /> the horn. He concurred wits Chair Narum's suggestion to add this as Question #12. <br /> Commissioner Pearce noted that the applicant had indicated that he was planning to <br /> install 93 new trees. She slated that the number of trees in Exhibit A does not total 93. <br /> Mr. Otto replied that the number of trees is in the range of 40. He added that the total <br /> number of trees could be 93 if the applicant adds trees in the side and rear yards. <br /> Chair Narum referred to the Tree Survey Map and inquired whether Trees #67 and #68 <br /> were located inside the wal on the property or outside the wall, or whether the wall was <br /> going through them. <br /> Mr. Otto replied that it is lot clear from the Map. He added that if the trees were <br /> extremely close to the wall, the trees could not be saved due to impacts from the wall <br /> footings. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, Feoruary 9, 2011 Page 1 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.