My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 4:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
parking spaces provided for the many families and visitors has been taken into <br /> consideration. <br /> Chair Narum advised that this would be considered under Question #7. <br /> Ms. Cruzan stated that several years ago, residents along this section of Stanley <br /> Boulevard did not feel that this particular development was right and had submitted <br /> statements of wanting to see four to eight homes which would maintain the existing <br /> zoning requirements. With respect to the Deodar cedar trees, she indicated that the <br /> developer had noted that these were unattractive and would never be allowed on a <br /> school campus; however, these are the same trees that stand in front of Amador High <br /> School. She indicated that if maintained properly, these trees are part of the beauty of <br /> the street, and she would like every effort be made to preserve them. She stated that <br /> these trees form part of the viewscape from her house; they filter out particulate matter <br /> and are also fairly close to the watershed. She added that it is possible to preserve <br /> heritage trees while providing open space for those who live in the development. <br /> Ms. Cruzan then requested that the nature of the street with the old house be <br /> preserved. She noted that the development calls for houses to be built very close to the <br /> rear yards of Del Valle Manor next door. She requested that the proposed homes have <br /> the same rearyard setback from the fence that Del Valle Manor has, which is about <br /> 15 feet. <br /> Darrell Walterson, neighbor, noted that the City encourages people to install <br /> Photovoltaic (PV) panels on their homes and that he installed PV panels in his property <br /> in 2007, He stated that no one had approached him regarding the proposed project or <br /> even noticed that he had PV panels, and voiced concerns about being left out of the <br /> process. He indicated that while he will be protected from the noise of the train, the <br /> proposed project will affect he in that it will be like living in a canyon with two, two-story <br /> buildings on his property line. He added that the efficiency of his PV panels would be <br /> negatively impacted by any kind of shade, and he questioned how he would be <br /> reimbursed for this. <br /> Mr. Walterson stated that there will be realignment and undergrounding of utilities on <br /> Stanley Boulevard, with sidewalks and parking only on one side as the south side will <br /> be set aside for a bike lane. He noted that this would cause congestion, and people will <br /> be parking in front of the existing houses. <br /> Christine Bourg, Downtown resident, stated that she is distressed to learn about the <br /> proposed demolition of the 1908 bungalow and concurred with the comments of other <br /> speakers regarding the removal of trees. She noted that this project has been <br /> discussed in their neighborhood for some time and that a local contractor who is familiar <br /> with the house had indicated that it would be easy to restore and renovate the <br /> bungalow; the contractor added that because the renovation would require a new <br /> foundation, the house could also easily be moved to accommodate a driveway that <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 6 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.