08 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Blank stated that this project reminds him of a proposal where someone came to the Commission with a two-story home in an area where only one-story homes were permitted, but the proposed two-story house actually had a lower roofline than the single-story homes in the area. He indicated that he is sensitive to the argument that it is not just the square footage, as some single-story homes are massive and should never have been built, while some two-story homes look less massive than some one-story homes. He added that he did not think a home should be disqualified simply because it is different than the homes around it; one must look at the massing as well as how the home fits in with the street architecture. Commissioner Blank stated that because he was not present at the Work Session and the first public hearing, he has not seen all of the changes in detail; however, looking at what was before and what was done afterwards, it appeared to him that the perceived massing of the home has been significantly reduced. He indicated that he is inclined to approve the project. Commissioner Pentin applauded everybody's efforts, including those of staff and the Commissioners, for working on the project and in reducing the perception of the massing. He stated that he believes the Cunninghams have brought a project to the Commission that complies with everything the City and the Commission asked them to do at an earlier workshop. He indicated that he still feels the same as he did the last time and voiced support and approval of the project. Commissioner Olson stated that he totally agrees with Commissioners Blank and Pentin and indicated that he will not change his vote. Commissioner Pearce stated that she very much appreciates the Cunninghams' willingness and good faith effort to meet with her and Chair Narum last week. She noted that it took a lot of time, and the Cunninghams have taken the time to make many changes to the house. She indicated that she thinks they are moving in the right direction but believes the house still does not meet Policy 17 of the Downtown Specific Plan, which refers to perception and excessive lot coverage concerns, which she feels are still present as demonstrated, however crudely, by the perceived FAR of the lower lot. She stated that, given that she still has concerns about the massing, she would not support the project. Chair Narum stated that this is a tough one but appreciates the Cunninghams' efforts in meeting with Commissioner Pearce and herself and in coming up with some proposed changes based on their comments, and then making further changes based on comments made at a subsequent meeting. She noted that her comments three weeks ago had to do with the appearance from the street and the relationship to the buildings, and believes that with the changes now, she can support the project and make the findings. She stated that if this project goes forward, she hopes for harmony in the neighborhood at some point as well. Commissioner Blank agreed that this is always very tough, and people need to heal when this is all over. EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 30, 2011 Page 5 of 6