11 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

tip. .. , `. t • 1 the inconsistency in the tence height would he unattractive from her yard. Ms. Pink also - " t indicated that she had not had a very good experience with previous lapped board fence designs; the fenceboards tended to fall out and become difficult to replace. Ms. Fink • indicated that she would prefer a different sort of fence design, more similar to her existing fence. -. . - - -- - . - 2. Mr. Carl Pretzel, 3633 Glacier Court North __. _ Mr. Pretzel has expressed to staff several concerns with the proposed rear yard fence. He would prefer a maximum 6'tall fence as measured from his side. If the fence were to be ' • • placed on the property line,lie would want the fence to be constructed) similarly to the existing fence rather than constructed as a good neighbor tenet;as proposed by the T i Deikes. Mr. Pretzel also is concerned about the preservatio.i of his concrete mow strip; he wants to ensure that if the fence is placed on the property line, the mow strip is not damaged by new footings for the knee posts. M . Pretzel realizes that the Deikes .. • ' probably do not want to construct a new fence which matches the •,xisting fence since It .. ' would not be very attractive front the Deikes side. Mr ?retzel notes his rear property line fence extends about another 16 feet past the t)eikes tut. 1 f a now 71 I" good neighbor . • knee as proposed by Mr. Deike were eons.ntcteit 'in the property line,two panels of Mr. •• Pretzel's fence would not match. And, if that e Iwo panels were reconstructed to match - • any new fence proposed by Mr. Deike,those two panels would not match the remainder of Ms.Fink's rear property line fence(Ms. Fink she-:s about 16' of rear property line • fencing with Mr. Pretzel, while the remainder of'her feree is shared with 3647 Glacier - - Court P .mh). Mr. Pretzel indicated that he would not be opposed to a double fence situation if Mr. Deike could place the new fence far enough away from the existing fence to allow both - _ property-owners to maintain their own fence. Mr. Pretzel notes that Mr. Deike then could-- - -- design the fence as he wants, but Mr.Pretzel still would not want the new fence to be constructed at the propoaad 7'11" height. Mr. Pretzel is sympathetic to the Delkes'desire -- to provide privacy fencing for the pool and rear yard area but thinks additional --- landscaping in the most affected areas(the southwest corner of the-lot adjacent to 3619 Glacier Court North)would be better way to do this. f Q Staff Comment* - Staff understands all the neighbors'desires to design and construct fences which are attractive and match existing fences where possible, and to create privacy. However,- staff ff - _ - notes that any approval of an overheight fence(up to g feet in height)is a discretionary - action bythe"Zoning Administrator. The Municipal Code allows only a 6 foot high -- CaseNo. Z9eail I =- _ - 7,rmmkAdminrJmrtor- -------- — - Page 4 • .