Laserfiche WebLink
• 1. / '. � L •�: �,'- <br /> f r, ' <br /> • <br /> believes that this third I inding can be made with the fences located and designed to the <br /> heights suggested by staff: <br /> -- _ ENVIRONMENTAL-ASSESSMENT - . -- <br /> Projects of this nature are cr egorically exempt (Class 3) f r o m the requirements of the--- -- --- <br /> California Quality Act (CEQA 1970,as amended). Therefore, no environmental •- <br /> document accompanies this report. <br /> • i CONCLUSION <br /> StatTrealizes that its recommendation of a maximum 6'6" fence located on the property <br /> Imes is not necessarily the ideal solution which each affected party would wan;. __--" _ <br /> Nonetheless,staff feels that its solution is a reasonable one which can provide each <br /> homeowner with some degree of satisfaction in terms of the desired additional privacy.. s <br /> the desire for fence heights and design to be compatible with existing fencing to remain,a <br /> desire for fences which are not overly tall or protruding above existing fences, and the <br /> desire for new fencing designed to the "good neighbor fence" standard. Staff believes <br /> that its proposed recommendation can meet some of the criteria of each person for what <br /> each would consider to the be the most desirable fence. - -- <br /> • <br /> S %RP RECOMMENDATION <br /> Sta n colr Yt..ads that the Zoning Administrator approve Case Z-98.211 with the <br /> changes as rec.,mmended oy staff subject to the conditions listed In Exhibit"R". : _ ? <br /> :'F <br /> Kern Watt <br /> — <br /> _:.Associate Planner <br /> :..:.- <br /> __. <br /> (0111!mum) <br /> • -- --_ 10.15.98/4w. <br /> Case No,- _ xfngddiM�toox <br /> _.y Ytil ---- L'�"J' -• a •n p ti.,1W •=l, 4 •_aA,iP ==ice`.r.l l\►il_wii�i�..t _ <br />