ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

2. HUD Has Brought Renewed Attention the opportunities and challenges it presents and to create to Fair Housing Concerns a space for dialogue about pater-dal concerns so they can be constructively addressed. Over the past four years,HUD has asked jurisdictions to pay renewed attention to their legal obligation to 3, The Challenges in California Have affirmatively further fair housing. This heightened Spurred New Creativity scrutiny comes on the heels of HUD's settlement with New York's Westchester County, in which the Many jurisdictions are experimenting with new ways county was required to: to tap market capital to create inclusive communities without requiring affordab e rental developments 3 Draft an analysis of impediments and action plan per se. As we have seen, some jurisdictions have to address racial segregation. restructured inclusionary policies as a fee, with developers given the opportunity to waive out a Spend$51.6 million to build 750 units of affordable of the fee by voluntarily constructing affordable housing in the 32 jurisdictions with the lowest rentals. Other local governments are looking more percentages of minority residents. closely at how they can leverage community-wide Take legal action against local communities rezonings to promote afordability, particularly within its boundaries that refuse to eliminate where these zoning changes create significant new exclusionary zoning.75 value for developers and/or landowners. HUD reportedly plans to come out with a new rule on In light of the growing need for creativity in jurisdictions affirmatively furthering fair housing in 2013. The rule will across the U.S., along with now support from HUD provide important opportunities for advancing affordable for fair housing, this may be a particularly strategic housing and mobility goals,but could be contentious.There time to consider new inclusionary housing tools and is a need to educate stakeholders about the new rule and approaches. Interviewees This paper benefited significantly from interviews with local housing staff, researchers, ald other experts in the field. Their ideas and insights greatly informed my research. I wish to thank: Michelle Allen Kathy Fedler Mary Beth Lonergan Susan Riggs TInsky City of Boulder(CO) City of Longmont(CO) Clarke Caton Hintz San Diego Housing Federation Emily Alvarado Catherine Firpo Alan Mallach Art Rodgers Housing Development City of Emeryville(CA) Metropolitan Policy Program, City of Washington,DC Consortium, The Brookings Institution Seattle-King County Adam Gordon Jaimie Ross Fair Share Housing Center Tammy Mayer Florida Housing Coalition Sean Caron Citizens Planning and Housing Citizens'Housing and Planning Sasha Hauswald Association Lisa Schwartz Association City of San Francisco(CA) Montgomery County(MD) Amy Mullay Mary Cele Smith Rick Jacobus City of Irvine(CA) Howard Slatkin City of Highland Park(IL) Cornerstone Partnership at Ci.y of New York City(NY) NCB Capital Impact Brian Pine Loryn Clark City of Burlington(VT) Evelyn Stivers Town of Chapel Hill(NC) Sarah Kariinsky Non-Profit Housing Association San Francisco Planning+ Melinda Pollack of Northern California Kristen Clements Urban Research(SPUR) Enterprise Community City of San Jose(CA) Partners Arthur Sullivan Matt Ladd A Regional Coalition for Melissa Dailey Fairfax County(VA) Mike Rawson Housing(ARCH) City of Santa Fe(NM) The Public Interest Law Michael Lane Project/California Affordable Brad Welnig Chandra Egan Non-Profit Housing Association Housing Law Project Erterprise Community City of San Francisco(CA) of Northern California Partners Cindy Reid Conrad Egan Janet Lewis Town of Davidson(NC) Mike Westlake Fairfax County(VA)Affordable Montgomery County(MD) City of San Diego(CA) Housing Advisory Committee; 16