|
CENTER FOR ' 37. Analysis by the Center for Housing Policy, 56.Interview with:Susan Riggs Tinsky,executive
<br /> €'�V11 il!� t� 2012. director,San Diego Housing Federation(5/17/12).
<br /> HOUSING 38.Many small and mid-sized jurisdictions don't 57. NPH and CCRH (2003). Massachusetts
<br /> have housing divisions.Often redevelopment dol- Association of CUCs (2006). Interview with
<br /> As the research affiliate of the lars were used to support staff members who were Melinda Pollack, vice president, solutions,
<br /> National Housing Conference i NI It splitting their time between administering redevel- Enterprise Community Partners (4/13/12).
<br /> opment area affordable housing programs and ad- Interview with Susan Riggs Tinsky, executive
<br /> the Center for Housing Policy ministering the jurisdiction's inclusionary housing director,San Diego Housing Federation(5/17/12).
<br /> specializes in developing solutions policy. 58.Calavita and Mallach (2010). This has
<br /> through research.in partnership with 39.Interview with Michael Lane, policy director, prompted New Jersey to recently pass a Use
<br /> NPH(12/12/12). it or Lose it" law, which requires municipalities
<br /> NNC and its members, the Center to either spend locally collected funds within
<br /> works to broaden understanding f 40.Rick Jacobus (2007); interview with Rick four years or forfeit them to a state affordable
<br /> Jacobus, director, Cornerstone Partnership at housing fund.It is not yet clear,however,whether
<br /> the nation's housing challenges and ;r NCB Capital Impact(5/21/12). this will ensure that all collected funds are
<br /> to examine the impact of COriC es ` 41. Interview with Michael Lane,policy director, invested in affordable housing, particularly in
<br /> and programs developed to address , NPH(12/12/12). areas of growing opportunity.
<br /> •
<br /> these needs, Combining research i- 42.California Affordable Housing Law Project of 59.Calavita and Mallach(2010).
<br /> and practical, real-world expertise, IIr the Public Interest Law Project(2010). 60.Interview with Rick Jacobus,director,Corner-
<br /> the Center helps to develop effective 43.Correspondence with Mike Rawson,director,the stone Partnership at NCB Capital Impact(5/21/12).
<br /> policy solutions at the national,state Public Interest Law Project/California Affordable 61. See for example Denver,Davidson(NC),San
<br /> Housing Law Project(11/14/12). Francisco,and Montgomery County(MD).
<br /> and local levels that increase the
<br /> 44.EPA OSC (2012). See also: Frey (2012);
<br /> " availability of affordable homes Mcllwain(2010);Kannan(2010). 62.One jurisdiction reports that inclusionary
<br /> r"
<br /> prices need to be as much as 30 percent lower
<br /> than market prices before buyers become
<br /> 45.Here I am referring to costs for developers, motivated to purchase inclusionary units. See
<br /> .7 rather than municipalities or regions as a whole.
<br /> a" Center for Housing Policy and the Lincoln
<br /> ACknowledgementS r" If we were to factor in the complete costs of Institute of Land Policy(2009).
<br /> infrastructure and externalities such as pollution
<br /> This report was prepare:(with generous in comparing infill versus other settings,this cost 63.Interview with Art Rodgers, senior housing
<br /> equation would be different. planner,Washington,DC(4/4/12).
<br /> support from the Ford Foundation. .i
<br /> Any opinions or conclusions expressed, 46.Litman(2012). 64.Interview with Lisa Schwartz,senior planning
<br /> however,are those of the author alone.
<br /> 47. Strategic Economics and Hixson&Associates specialist,Montgomery County(MD)(5/1/12).
<br /> (2008). 65.Jacobus(November 2007).
<br /> Special thanks also to: Rick Jacobus, 48.Trombka et al.(2004).This is not to suggest 66.Thaden(2011).
<br /> that there are no cost saving opportunities in
<br /> Patrick Maier, and Rob Wiener for infill settings.Walkable,transit-rich communities 67. The Housing Partnership(2007).
<br /> their valuable feedback; Jeffrey make it possible to serve residents with fewer
<br /> parking spaces, for example.And many policies 68.Interview with Arthur Sullivan, program
<br /> Lubel! for serving as editor, Renee allow inclusionary units to use more modest manager,ARegionalCoalitionforHousing(5/21/12).
<br /> Saunders of RM Saunders Design for finishes and appliances. But the placement 69.Interview with Chandra Egan,senior commu-
<br /> of inclusionary units in the same building as nity development specialist II,city of San Francisco
<br /> designing the report; and the dozens market-rate units makes it more difficult to save (4/13/12).
<br /> of local governmental staff and other costs through other important means, such as
<br /> reducing the size of inclusionary units, using 70.Fairfax County Office of Community Revital-
<br /> experts who made time for interviews different materials for the building's exterior,or ization and Reinvestment(October 2011).
<br /> over the past year. limiting common-area amenities.
<br /> 71. New York City Department of City Planning
<br /> 49.Trombka et al.(2004). (February 17,2009).
<br /> 50.Interview with Howard Slatkin, director of 72. HUD(July 2011).
<br /> sustainability,NYC Department of City Planning
<br /> (5/14/12). 73. Calavita and Mallach(2009).
<br /> Center for Housing Policy 51. HousingPolicy.org Forum(2008-2011). 74. Interview with Melinda Pollack, vice presi-
<br /> and National Housing Conference dent-solutions, En:erprise Community Partners
<br /> 1900 M Street,NW 52.NPH(2007). (4/13/12).
<br /> Suite 200 53.NPH(2007). 75. Hannah Jones(November 2,2012).
<br /> Washington,DC 20036,;;-
<br /> 54.NLIHC(2012).
<br /> Phone:(2021 466-2121
<br /> Fax:(202r 466-2122 55.This has been successful in Montgomery
<br /> Email.r.hp feedt;atk nhc,oi i1 County(MD)and Fairfax County(VA).
<br /> wwW.r1t1C.0rg
<br /> www.housingpolicv.orq
<br /> 8
<br />
|