Laserfiche WebLink
4/24/13 Bill Teo-AB-1229 Land use:zoning regulations. <br /> (3) The percentage of a lot which may be occupied by a building or structure. <br /> (4) The intensity of land use. <br /> (d) Establish requirements for offstrcct off-street parking and loading. <br /> (e) Establish and maintain building setback lines. <br /> (f) Create civic districts around civic centers, public parks, public buildings, or public grounds, and establish <br /> regulations for those civic districts. <br /> (g) Establish, as a condition of development, inclusionary housing requirements, which may require the <br /> provision of residential units affordable to, and occupied by, owners or tenants whose household incomes do <br /> not exceed the limits for lower income, very low income, or extremely low income households specified in <br /> Sections 50079.5, 50105, and 50106 of the Health and Safety Code. <br /> SEC. 2. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: <br /> (a) Inclusionary housing ordinances have provided quality affordable housing to over 80,000 Californians, <br /> including the production of an estimated 30,000 units of affordable housing in the last decade alone. <br /> (b) Since the 1970s, over 170 jurisdictions have enacted inclusionary housing ordinances to meet their <br /> affordable housing needs. <br /> (c) While many of these local programs have been in place for decades, the recent decision in Palmer/Sixth <br /> Street Properties, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1396, has creased uncertainty and <br /> confusion for local governments regarding the future viability of this important local land use tool. <br /> (d) It is the intent of the Legislature to reaffirm the authority of local jurisdictions to enact and enforce these <br /> ordinances. <br /> (e) The Legislature declares its intent in adding subdivision (g) to Section 65850 of the Govemment Code, <br /> pursuant to Section 1 of this act, to supersede any holding or dicta in Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. <br /> City of Los Angeles (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1396, to the extent that the opinion in that case conflicts with <br /> that subdivision. This act shall not otherwise be construed to enlarge or diminish the authority of a jurisdiction <br /> beyond those powers that existed as of July 21, 2009. <br /> leg info.legislature.ca.god faces/billNatelient. tni?bill_id=201320140AB1229 2/2 <br />