Laserfiche WebLink
From: - <br /> To: lanire vrin <br /> Subject: East Pleasanton Specific Plan <br /> Date: Friday,May 17,2013 12:31:02 PM <br /> Dear Ms Stern: <br /> I am a resident of Pleasanton and a member of the board of directors of Danbury <br /> Park Homeowner's Association. I would like to express my opinion regarding the <br /> alternatives pertaining to the East Pleasanton Specific Plan. <br /> I feel that Alternative 1 is the only fair option and feel that alternative will have the <br /> least adverse impact on East Pleasanton. It creates a balance of high density units <br /> vs lower density units and creates a more balanced community that looks more like <br /> other neighborhoods throughout the city. It also creates more of a balance of low <br /> cost housing across the city versus putting most on the East Side--(the City Counsel <br /> and the previous Mayor have expressed their opinion that such low cost housing <br /> should be spread evenly across the city and not concentrated in East Pleasanton). <br /> The East Side creates a good opportunity to create a new community, which should <br /> be one that is consistent with what other neighborhoods look like in the city. At least <br /> 50% of the homes should be single family. Also, there should be an extension from <br /> El Charro to Stanley so that traffic does not overburden existing neighborhoods. <br /> So please accept my opinion and arguments for Alternative 1. <br /> Robert Gonella <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br />