Laserfiche WebLink
From: Patrick(-9c-fawn <br /> To: Janice Stem:Wayne Rasrnusseu <br /> Cc: <br /> Subject: EPSP Task Force Info <br /> Date: Thursday,May 30,2013 2:49:01 PM <br /> Importance: High <br /> Hi Janice and Wayne <br /> I have been trying to absorb the various comments at the Planning Commission last week. <br /> It seems there are two major decisions the Task Force and ultimately the Council will need <br /> to make with respect to housing. The percentage of the projected RHNA numbers that <br /> should be planned for in this area and then, given that percentage, what mix of high <br /> density housing vs. all housing is appropriate for the area. Of course, taking into account if <br /> a plan is financially feasible given the infrastructure and fee requirements. We heard from <br /> speakers that the city overall is a 25%/75% ratio (HD/Low Density) and that they would like <br /> this replicated in EPSP but that maybe they could live with 35/65. ( I assume they are <br /> talking as percentages of units and not acres but it would be good to clarify) Planning <br /> Commission was definitely interested in a "balance" although I don't believe a number was <br /> voted on. <br /> I have done some calculations that I believe will help the Task Force and Could in their <br /> decision-making. <br /> Taking these two issues I have first looked at the latest Alternatives, Alts 1 to 4 given the <br /> unit counts provided. Their ratios are: <br /> Alt 1 is 50/50 <br /> Alt 2 is 67/33 <br /> Alt 3 is 71.5/28.5 <br /> Alt 4 is 50/50 <br /> I then looked at what would the numbers be if the Council decided they wanted to meet <br /> 25%, 30%, 35% or 40% of the RHNA numbers--- I defined this number as the required <br /> number of" Very Low/Low + Moderate", assuming the Above Moderate will be met by the <br /> other housing (5-16dua). After calculating the required HD RHNA numbers for each <br /> scenario, I then calculated the total number of units that would be needed to achieve the <br /> 25/75, 35/75 and also 40/60 ratios. Taking these numbers I held the 23 dua and 30 dua <br /> fixed at the appropriate percentages (i.e. 25% requires 195 at 23dua and 305 at 30dua) and <br /> calculated a mix of 5, 8, 11 and 16 dua acreages to achieve the total number to make the <br /> desired ratio. (i.e. at 30% RHNA and 35/65 ratio a total of 1737 homes is needed.) <br /> It is very helpful to review the inform this format. For example, at 2000 units 25% of RHNA <br /> HD can be provided at 25/75 ratio, or 35% HD at a 35/65 ratio or 40% HD at a 40/60 ratio. <br />