Laserfiche WebLink
Citizens for a Caring Community <br /> P.O. Box 1781 , Pleasanton CA 94566 <br /> June 6, 2013 <br /> East Pleasanton Specific Plan Task Force <br /> Brian Dolan, Director of Community Development <br /> Janice Stem, Planning Manager <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> Dear Task Force members, <br /> Here is the source and worksheet background for my earlier comments, which you received yesterday. <br /> Employee density information was derived from the Pleasanton General Plan Land Use Element, Table 2-4 <br /> on page 2-17: <br /> TABLE 2-4: EMPLOYEE DENSITY STANDARDS <br /> Workplace Type Average Square Foot Per Employee <br /> Office 300 <br /> Research & Development 340 <br /> Light Manufacturing 435 <br /> Warehouse/Service Industrial 560 <br /> Service Commercial 625 <br /> Retail 510 <br /> Restaurant '170 <br /> Hotel/Motel '1,370 <br /> Source: ITE(Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual, 7m Edition rates,adjusted for Pleasanton. <br /> Information on earnings and wage distributions for various occupation categories, as well as the metrics for <br /> employees generated by the various types of market-rate housing development came from information <br /> published in 2011 by the Economic Roundtable entitled Affordable Housing Benefit Fee Study:The Nexus <br /> between New Market-Rate Development and the Subsequent Increase in Demand f ar Affordable <br /> Housing in the City of Los Angeles. While the information isn't adjusted for Pleasanton or the Tri- <br /> Valley, it is recent, and gathered from a wide range of southern California communities that are part <br /> of the State's economy. Pleasanton will soon have its own nexus study in hand which will provide <br /> more precise metrics for our area. Nonetheless, one can safely assume it will show that both market- <br /> rate residential development and commercial development will increase Pleasanton's need to provide <br /> affordable workforce housing. The specific tables I used from the Economic Roundtable study are <br /> the following: <br />