Laserfiche WebLink
To: EPSP Task Force <br /> From: Erin Kvistad <br /> Date: 6/6/2013 <br /> Re: Comments to Meeting Agenda <br /> Comments: <br /> Is each of the 4 plans mutually exclusive or can we still work on combining various <br /> features from the 4 plans?All the comments seem to pick one plan over another(primary <br /> reason seemed to be for RHNA numbers/percentages) rather than taking the best of each <br /> plan and working to develop a better plan. <br /> Plan 1: <br /> • Most favored by the residents of my Ironwood neighborhood due to the lowest <br /> RHNA number. The neighbors are concerned that this area is taking the brunt of <br /> the RHNA responsibility. <br /> • The placement of the high density housing at Stanley and El Charro is preferred. <br /> The Busch RoadNalley placement is less optimal, but better on the outskirts of <br /> the plan area than in the middle. <br /> Plan 2: <br /> • The high density housing placed in the middle is NOT preferred. All of the <br /> remaining neighborhoods and streets will be heavily impacted by this design. <br /> Plan 3: <br /> • Why do we have to go from 3DU/AC to 23? Can't the 23 DU/AC be 8 or II? Or <br /> even just 3, if we leave in the 30? Converting the 23 to 3, 4 or 8, this plan would <br /> still considerably contribule to the RHNA. <br /> • With this much density, Boulder needs to be extended as well to absorb some of <br /> the traffic. <br /> Plan 4: <br />