My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
061813
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2013 4:41:14 PM
Creation date
6/13/2013 11:22:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/18/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: Ted S.Chu <br /> To: lanirp Stern <br /> Cc: helen zhana <br /> Subject: East Pleasanton Specific Plan Options <br /> Date: Monday,June 10,2013 8:39:06 PM <br /> Dear Ms. Stern: <br /> We are residents of Ironwood Community of Pleasanton, and we are writing to express our serious <br /> concerns regarding the four available options for the East Pleasanton planning for high density <br /> housing. We moved to Pleasanton mainly for good schools and a community with 76°/' of housing <br /> units that are single family and owner occupied. So far we love the people and communities in <br /> Pleasanton. <br /> Unfortunately all the new options will create a community that is the opposite of rest of Pleasanton in <br /> terms of owners vs. renters and density of affordable housing. We strongly believe this will negatively <br /> impact our neighborhoods in terms of over-crowding our classrooms, lowering our API scores, <br /> worsening traffic congestion, and creating imbalance of high density housing in the city. <br /> Here are a few key points from residents of our community: <br /> (1) Ironwood community have been doing its fair share to support the city of pleasanton by providing <br /> supports for senior housing and active adults (over 55 years old) community. <br /> (2) The Higher Density housing should be balanced across the city to meet needs instead of being <br /> placed in any one are like the east side to protect quality of life and insure we create neighborhoods <br /> that are <br /> balanced. So we are totally against putting more than 1,000 units in the East Pleasanton area <br /> (3) The extremely high density housing should be placed further away from the the existing <br /> community, such as Iron Wood community, where there are a lot of senior citizens living in this area, <br /> and they are very <br /> sensitive to noise and traffic. This will also minimize the negative impact of the house value of <br /> existing community <br /> We strongly request one new alternative option with less than 1,000 units (similar to option 1, but need <br /> significant modification), including the following features <br /> (a) With at least 50% should be at the lower density, and 25% at the high densities. <br /> (b) Move High density to the edge of Stanley (instead of 1 at Busch, another at Stanley, as in Option <br /> 1), near the higher capability roadways to minimize the negative impacts on neighborhood streets; Can <br /> we even <br /> consider 1 high density close to the office area next to 1580 or near the BART station? <br /> (c) Prevent Busch Road to become a traffic collector <br /> (d) Move schools closer to the high density housing <br /> (e) Utilize the east side of Stanley instead of west side of Stanley <br /> We sincerely appreciate your consideration of our concerns as well as the input from a l from our <br /> community. Thank you. <br /> Best Regards <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.