My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 05-07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:38:57 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:26:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 7 <br /> DRAFT MEMORANDUM <br /> To: City of Pleasanton <br /> From: Jason Moody and Michael Nimon <br /> Subject: EPSP Infrastructure Feasibility Analysis; <br /> EPS #121090 <br /> Date: July 25, 2013 <br /> The Frnnomicc of bind Cm. Introduction <br /> Over the past year, the City of Pleasanton has been planning for new <br /> development in East Pleasanton through the East Pleasanton Specific <br /> Plan (EPSP). The City's General Plan calls for a potential mix of housing, <br /> I -, office, retail, and industrial uses as well as parks and open space. The <br /> EPSP area comprises approximately 1,110 acres on the northeast edge of <br /> the City and consists of mostly undeveloped land, combined with <br /> previously used industrial and mining uses and lakes. About 406 acres <br /> are considered developable. <br /> Economic & Planning Systems (EPS) has been involved in assessing a <br /> variety of economic and financial issues associated with the EPSP <br /> program options. These initial financial feasibility screens have informed <br /> the allocation and magnitude of potential development options based on <br /> the infrastructure burden relative to the potential finished value of each <br /> program option. Four revised options have been prepared based on <br /> input from the Task Force over the last several months, with revised <br /> infrastructure cost estimates prepared by Kier & Wright Civil Engineers <br /> Surveyors. This analysis also evaluates an additional development <br /> alternative (option 7), prepared based on discussion with City staff and <br /> summarized in Appendix Bt. <br /> Economic 8 Planning Systems,Inc. <br /> 2501 Ninth Street,Suite 200 <br /> Berkeley,C4 94710-2257 <br /> 510 841 9190 tel <br /> 510 841 9208 fax <br /> Berkeley <br /> Denver <br /> Los Angeles <br /> Sacramento <br /> 1 This alternative represents an offshoot from Option 5 and reflects the <br /> www.epsys.com residential product types discussed at the June 19th Taskforce Meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.