Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br /> Commissioner Allen referred to Peter MacDonald's email regarding valuation of the <br /> property and land values per square feet. She noted that Mr. MacDonald's valuation <br /> method was very different from that in the staff report, indicating that land in the Downtown <br /> has never sold for over $100 per square foot, versus the methodology used in the staff <br /> report which brought up the cost of the land to over $660 per square foot. She asked staff <br /> to explain the methodologies and why one was chosen over the other or if there is flexibility <br /> there. <br /> Ms. Stern explained that calculated as an opportunity cost, the formula is basically the <br /> number of square feet that the owner is foregoing development on, times the rent that it <br /> could have gotten from that area, times 12 months to determine the annual income, and <br /> then divided by the capitalization rate percentage. She continued that applied to 511 Main <br /> Street, the calculation would be 666 square feet of plaza, times $3.75 monthly rent per <br /> square foot, times 12 months, divided by 6.5 percent capitalization rate = $461,076. She <br /> added that Pamela Ott, Director of Economic Development, is present and may want to add <br /> more information on the matter. <br /> Commissioner Allen inquired if that included all the building cost. <br /> Ms. Ott explained that Mr. MacDonald's calculation refers to the cost of acquiring the land <br /> and the cost of constructing the building itself, which are the fixed costs that go into the <br /> consideration. She indicated that staff is actually looking at current market value of <br /> property, which includes the capitalization rate. She added that this formula includes the <br /> calculation of what the opportunity gained or opportunity lost to that property owner is as a <br /> result of using land for a public plaza rather than for constructing a building. <br /> Commissioner Allen inquired if it included all improvement costs that the tenant needed to <br /> make. <br /> Ms. Ott said yes. She stated that the capitalization rate includes the operating income and <br /> cost, and factors in the capital cost as well. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that it might be of interest to the Commission to know, in terms of the <br /> history of that one particular site, that the City wanted the plaza, that it was the City's <br /> thinking that there had to be some way to make the developer whole instead of just <br /> demanding that the plaza be provided, and that it was the City's idea to have a set of rules <br /> to use elsewhere. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that her understanding is that this is just a mechanism to <br /> allow the City Council the flexibility to do this. <br /> Ms. Stern said yes. She added that it does not mandate the City Council to allow everyone <br /> to do this. She indicated that the City Council will review the proposal to determine whether <br /> or not it is appropriate, and there will be a judgment call by the City Council that the <br /> developer meets the criteria and the objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan that the <br /> proposed plaza is in the right place, designed properly, and so forth. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 1/8/2014 Page 3 of 11 <br />