My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
020414
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:00:10 PM
Creation date
1/29/2014 3:55:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> Ms. Stern replied that was correct. She stated that it is a question of where the parking is <br /> in the Downtown: on the periphery at those peak times, not on Main Street and not on the <br /> close side streets. <br /> Commissioner Ritter indicated that he loves that plaza concept that staff came up with to <br /> support the Downtown area. <br /> Chair Olson referred to letter from the Pleasanton Downtown Association (PDA) and noted <br /> that the first paragraph states that the PDA supports the proposed amendments with the <br /> provision that the City replenish the funds being waived for the developer in exchange for a <br /> public amenity. He inquired if the package being presented to the Commission requires the <br /> City to make those deposits to the fund. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that it does not. He indicated that this was an issue raised by the same <br /> people when the item originally came before the City Council. He noted that it was not <br /> something that the City Council included in its vote; hence, staff did not include that at this <br /> time. <br /> Chair Olson inquired if there is a plan for providing some sort of parking structure for the <br /> Downtown. He stated that the reason he is asking is because other communities that <br /> Downtown Pleasanton competes with have such parking facilities, such as the parking <br /> structure in Livermore. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that the City is in the process of acquiring some additional sections of the <br /> Alameda County Transportation Corridor but that the City does not have any plans for a <br /> parking structure at this time. She added that if something came up in the Downtown <br /> where there might be some partnership with private development that will result in a <br /> parking structure that the City can jointly pay for, the City would look at that possibility, but <br /> there are no plans for that. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that the City has actually acquired in fee all of the Transportation Corridor <br /> within the Downtown with the one exception of that stretch next to the gas station that is <br /> being proposed for remodel, and the City has an agreement to purchase that and acquire in <br /> fee as soon as the cleanup of the plume that the gas station created over time is <br /> completed. He indicated that the plan is to continue to extend parking up the <br /> Transportation Corridor. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that this all comes down to a reset of the community's willingness to walk <br /> a walkable Downtown because right now, even in the busiest times, there actually are <br /> parking spaces in the closer Transportation Corridor lot, and there are parking spaces in <br /> Peters Avenue. He added that with very few exceptions, there is also available parking in <br /> the City Hall lots almost all the time, except maybe when the Pleasanton Library has a big <br /> event, during the First Wednesday events during the summer, but that is perceived by <br /> many as too far to go. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 1/8/2014 Page 5 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.