My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. Whether streets and buildings have been designed and located to complement the <br /> natural terrain and landscape. <br /> The project site is in a developed area of the City and would not involve the extension of <br /> any new public streets. The relatively flat, urban infill site has no constraints to either roads <br /> or buildings. Development of the site complements the n.atural terrain by making only <br /> minor changes as necessary to the site's existing relatively flat topography. The proposed <br /> buildings will be compatible in size and scale with surrounding structures. <br /> Therefore, staff believes that this PUD finding can be made. <br /> 6. Whether adequate public safety measures have been incorporated into the design of <br /> the plan. <br /> The public improvements associated with this project would be consistent with City design <br /> standards. The driveway entrances are located and configured to provide adequate line-of- <br /> sight viewing distance and to facilitate efficient ingress/egress to and from the project site. <br /> All on-site drive aisles would meet City standards for emergency vehicle access and turn- <br /> around. Adequate access would be provided to all structures for police, fire, and other <br /> emergency vehicles. Buildings would be required to meet the requirements of the Uniform <br /> Building Code, Fire Code, other applicable City codes, and State of California energy and <br /> accessibility requirements. The buildings would be equipped with automatic fire <br /> suppression systems (sprinklers). <br /> Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. <br /> 7. Whether the plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District. <br /> The proposed PUD development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD district. One of <br /> these purposes is to ensure that the desires of the developer and the community are <br /> understood and approved prior to commencement of construction. Staff believes that the <br /> proposed project implements the purposes of the PUD ordinance in this case by providing <br /> a high-density residential project that is well-designed and well-integrated with the existing <br /> office development on adjoining properties, that fulfills the desires of the applicant, and that <br /> meets the City's General Plan goals and policies. Moreover, input from the adjacent <br /> property owners has been sought and obtained through Planning Commission work <br /> sessions; further opportunity for public comment will occur at the Planning Commission, <br /> Housing Commission, and City Council hearings. <br /> Staff believes that through the PUD process the proposed project has provided the <br /> developer and the City with a development plan that optimizes the use of this infill site in a <br /> sensitive manner. <br /> Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. <br /> PUD-103/Summerhill Apartment Communities Planning Commission <br /> Page 30 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.