My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
but for the most part, the majority met with Summerhill representatives at the <br /> community meetings. <br /> • On October 6, 2013, Summerhill introduced the project and answered <br /> questions at the neighborhood meeting organized and hosted by a Parkside <br /> resident. <br /> • On Sunday, October 20, 2013, Summerhill hosted a neighborhood meeting to <br /> again present the project and hear additional comments. <br /> • In mid-November of last year, Summerhill developed a fact sheet for the City <br /> and neighborhood leaders for distribution, for transparency and to respond to <br /> all of the questions posted individually and at group meetings regarding this <br /> project. <br /> Mr. Ebrahimi stated that Summerhill has been very successful in its projects as it <br /> accommodates the neighbors while keeping the projects economically feasible. He <br /> noted that both aspects need to work together to make a project work. <br /> Mr. Ebrahimi added that they were asked last week to consider three other items <br /> following staffs meeting with the neighbors: <br /> 1. Provide landscaping to screen the proposed six-foot tall masonry wall on the <br /> south property line of the community. <br /> Creeping fig vine has been incorporated for this visual screening, as shown in the <br /> plans presented earlier. <br /> 2. Prohibit pets, dogs in particular. <br /> The apartment community would be at a great disadvantage if it did not allow for <br /> dog ownership. Residents will want to have that option, and Summerhill will want <br /> to continue to offer that flexibility. <br /> 3. Location of trash bins at the southeasterly location of Building D. <br /> The design and location of the trash bins are being modified so garbage trucks <br /> do not require access to the rear alley for pick-up of any items. <br /> Mr. Ebrahimi indicated that their consultant team is present to answer any questions the <br /> Commission may have. <br /> Robert Natsch, acting as spokesperson for the Parkside community, stated that his <br /> house is directly across the Arroyo from the Summerhill development. He indicated <br /> that, for the most part and given the requirements, the Summerhill Complex drawings <br /> are very professional and that the Parkside group was encouraged by the changes <br /> made to the original plans: moving the pool to the center of the development, <br /> eliminating the balconies and stairways from Buildings C and D facing the Arroyo, <br /> sloping the rooflines on Buildings C and D, adding the six-foot tall sound wall and a gate <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 22, 2014 Page 4 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.