Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Soo replied that was correct. <br /> Commissioner Posson thanked Summerhill and staff for providing additional views <br /> because he thinks they h elp significantly. He stated that when he looked at the view <br /> from the south, his first reaction was that there was a lot of roof. He indicated that he <br /> did go back a_ nd read the Minutes from the previous hearing, but he thinks that the <br /> reduction on the three-story on the rear side of the building did not help. He noted that <br /> part of the comments was the visual impact of the building itself, and be recalls <br /> someone suggested story poles. He stated that he thinks it might be beneficial to look <br /> at story poles to show the residents what the profile would look like for the entire <br /> development, not just for Buildings C and D but also for Buildings A and B as well, <br /> because there have been some comments about these views not being accurate <br /> representations of what the development would look like. He indicated that he is not yet <br /> convinced that the design of both those buildings fit the visual impacts the Commission <br /> would like to see. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that part of the discussion at the last Work Session was <br /> the visual impact of looking at the building and moving some of the units, as well as <br /> privacy because there was another set of windows up there that looked into people's <br /> yards. He noted that those have been accomplished. He stated that he does not know <br /> if there is anything that can be done with the massing as they have moved as many <br /> units as they can, and there is not much more that can be done at the back while <br /> meeting the 30 units to the acre that needs to be done. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he would like to see an additional visual that shows <br /> Buildings A and B in the distance, if that can be added in. He added that he does not <br /> know if erecting story poles for a project of this size would help a lot to do anything of <br /> significance. He pointed out that one thing he would like the applicant to look at is <br /> another way of cutting that roofline to make it look less massive; however, he does not <br /> know what could be done because there would be units right behind them, and that <br /> could expose windows back into the southern direction. He stated that he is fine with <br /> where the units are going to be. He indicated, however, that he would like something <br /> done to reduce that massing which is very flat and goes all the way across, and maybe <br /> improve the roof a bit. <br /> Mr. Dolan asked if the Commission noticed that there were some variations in the roof, <br /> that there are small sections that stick out a little bit farther on the end. He pointed out <br /> that there is a lot of brown, but there is going to be some shadow and some variation. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor noted that it does look like it sticks out, even when looking at <br /> the lower one; but it almost looks like everything melds in, or at least that is what the <br /> visual will look like with a flat, one-color roof. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that there will be some shadow that will help show the difference. He <br /> added that the alternative was to leave the windows, and there might have even been <br /> decks and balconies out there, but this was the number one concern of the neighbors. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 22, 2014 Page 10 of 16 <br />