Laserfiche WebLink
SB 1262 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 16 of 18 <br /> Page 21 <br /> a) AB 473 (Ammiano) of the current legislative session <br /> would have created the Division of Medical Marijuana <br /> Regulation and Enforcement in order to regulate the <br /> cultivation, manufacture, testing, transportation, <br /> distribution, and sale of medical marijuana. AB 473 failed <br /> passage on the Assembly floor. <br /> b) AB.604 (Ammiano) of the current legislative session, was <br /> gutted and amended from a different subject matter and <br /> would have enacted the Medical Cannabis Regulation and <br /> Control Act. AB 604 was never heard by the Senate Public <br /> Safety Committee. <br /> c) AB 2312 (Ammiano), of the 2011-12 Legislative Session, <br /> would have established the Medical Marijuana Regulation and <br /> Control Act, authorizing local taxes on medical cannabis <br /> and creating a board to regulate the medical cannabis <br /> industry. AB 2312 was never heard by the Senate Committee <br /> on Business, Professions and Economic Development. <br /> d) AB 1300 (Blumenfield), Chapter 196, Statutes of 2011, <br /> provides that a local government entity may enact an <br /> ordinance regulating the location, operation or <br /> establishment of a medical marijuana cooperative or <br /> collective; authorizes local government entity to enforce <br /> such ordinances through civil or criminal remedies and <br /> actions; and authorizes a local government entity to enact <br /> any ordinance that is consistent with the Medical Marijuana <br /> Program. AB 1300 did not directly regulate medical <br /> marijuana facilities. <br /> e) SB 626 (Calderon), of the 2011-12 Legislative Session, <br /> would have required the Board of Equalization (BOE) to <br /> establish a nine-member task force to conduct a study to <br /> determine ways to enhance collections of sales and use <br /> taxes on retail sales of marijuana and ensure proper <br /> regulation of the cultivation, transportation, and <br /> distribution of marijuana and marijuana products. SB 626 <br /> was held on the Senate Appropriations Committee's Suspense <br /> File. <br /> f) AB 390 (Ammiano), of the 2009-10 Legislative Session, <br /> would have legalized the possession, sale, cultivation and <br /> other conduct relating to marijuana and required Alcoholic <br /> SB 1262 <br /> Page 22 <br /> Beverage Control (ABC) to administer and enforce the terms <br /> of legalized marijuana. AB 390 passed this Committee and <br /> was never heard by the Assembly Committee on Health. <br /> g) 5B 1098 (Migden) , of the 2007-08 Legislative Session, <br /> would have required the State Board of Equalization to <br /> administer a tax amnesty program, as specified, for medical <br /> marijuana dispensaries, as defined. SB 1098 was never <br /> voted on by the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee. <br /> h) SB 420 (Vasconcellos) Chapter 875, Statutes of 2003, <br /> established the Medical Marijuana Program Act, a statewide, <br /> voluntary program for the issuance of identification cards <br /> to identify persons authorized to engage in the medical use <br /> of marijuana under the Compassionate Use Act. <br /> i) Proposition 215, of the November 1996 General Election, <br /> http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/sen/sb_1 251-13OO/sb_1262_cfa_2O14O626_11195O_asm_comm.htm I 7/3/2014 <br />