My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
071514
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2015 4:32:05 PM
Creation date
7/9/2014 1:59:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AB2188 —2— <br /> This bill would specify that these provisions address a statewide <br /> concern. The bill would additionally require a city, county, or city and <br /> county to adopt,on or before September 30, 2015, in consultation with <br /> specified public entities an ordinance that creates an expedited, <br /> streamlined permitting process for small residential rooftop solar energy <br /> systems,as specified.The bill would additionally require a city,county, <br /> or city and county to inspect a small residential rooftop solar energy <br /> system eligible for expedited review within 5 busi..ets days of ai.y <br /> uS.tywcfied—, anal-tv-pc vPi. only one inspection, exa,ept in a <br /> timely manner, as specified. The bill would prohibit a city, county, or <br /> city and county from conditioning the approval of any solar energy <br /> system permit on approval of that system by an association that manages <br /> a common interest development. The bill would require a solar energy <br /> system for heating water to be certified by an accredited listing agency, <br /> as defined. <br /> Because the bill would impose new duties upon local governments <br /> and local agencies, it would impose a state-mandated local program. <br /> (2) Existing law prohibits any covenant, restriction, or condition <br /> contained in any deed,contract,security instrument,or other instrument <br /> affecting the transfer or sale of, or any interest in, real property, and <br /> any provision of a governing document from effectively prohibiting or <br /> restricting the installation or use of a solar energy system. Existing law <br /> exempts from that prohibition provisions that impose reasonable <br /> restrictions on a solar energy system that do not significantly increase <br /> the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency or specified <br /> performance. Existing law defines the term "significantly," for these <br /> purposes, with regard to solar domestic water heating systems or solar <br /> swimming pool heating systems that comply with state and federal law, <br /> to mean an amount exceeding 20% of the cost of the system or <br /> decreasing the efficiency of the solar energy system by an amount <br /> exceeding 20%. and with regard to photovoltaic systems that comply <br /> with state and federal law, an amount not to exceed $2,000 over the <br /> system cost or a decrease in system efficiency of an amount exceeding <br /> 20%, as specified. Existing law requires a solar energy system for <br /> heating water subject to the provisions described above to be certified <br /> by the Solar Rating Certification Corporation or another nationally <br /> recognized certification agency. <br /> This bill would instead define the term "significantly," for these <br /> purposes, with regard to solar domestic water heating systems or solar <br /> swimming pool heating systems that comply with state and federal law, <br /> 94 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.