My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
071514
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2015 4:32:05 PM
Creation date
7/9/2014 1:59:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AB 2052 Assembly Bill-Bill Analysis Page 4 of 6 <br /> workers' compensation system to non-California peace officers. <br /> While out-of-state workers can be eligible to file within <br /> California's workers' compensation system, this would be a <br /> significant change in law in terms of peace officers <br /> presumptions. Again, it is unclear how this would within the <br /> existing structure of the workers' compensation presumptions. <br /> 3. Proponent Arguments . <br /> Proponents argue that, when the presumptions were originally <br /> created in the 1970s, the Legislature intended to include all <br /> active peace officers. However, since the 1970s, proponents <br /> note that several classes of peace officers have been created <br /> which are outside of existing workers' compensation <br /> presumptions. Proponents believe that these classes have been <br /> excluded from current presumptions because they did not exist <br /> prior to the original drafting, which the proponents believe <br /> to be fundamentally unjust. Proponents believe that AB 2052 <br /> addresses this by extending current presumptions to all <br /> classes of peace officers. <br /> 4. Opponent Arguments . <br /> Opponents argue that, under existing law, the burden of proof <br /> for presumed occupational injuries lies with the employer and, <br /> due to the requirement of a liberal interpretation of workers' <br /> compensation law by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board <br /> (WCAB), it is virtually impossible for a public employer to <br /> dispute occupational causation of an injury. Opponents <br /> further argue that this results in millions of dollars of <br /> claims being paid where evidence is limited that the injury is <br /> actually occupational. By expanding the number of peace <br /> officer classes covered by the presumptions, opponents argue <br /> that this will place even greater cost pressures on local <br /> governments, taking away from their ability to fund services. <br /> 5. Prior Legislation <br /> Hearing Date: June 25, 2014 AB 7052 <br /> Consultant: Gideon L. Baum Page 5 <br /> senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations <br /> AB 1035 (Perez) , Statutes of 2014, Chapter 15, extends the <br /> timelines that limit a dependent from filing for workers' <br /> compensation death benefits if the deceased worker died of <br /> Cancer, Tuberculosis, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus <br /> aureus (MRSA) skin infections, or a bloodborne infectious <br /> disease. <br /> SUPPORT <br /> Peace Officers Research Association of California (PORAC) <br /> (Sponsor) <br /> Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs <br /> Association of Probation Supervisors <br /> California Applicants' Attorneys Association <br /> California Correctional Peace Officers Association <br /> California School Employees Association, AFL-CIO <br /> http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/asm/ab_2051-2100/ab_2052_cfa_20140624_092044_sen_comm.html 7/3/2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.