22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Nagler echoed what has been said. He stated that this is an example that it is possible to do a major development in a way that takes everyone's perspective into account and be responsive. He added that in the future, when the City get projects where there's significant disagreement, it will be appropriate for the Commission to push towards an agreement that is exemplified by what has been brought forward this evening. Chair Allen echoed that as well, and as the Commission has always said, when developers and citizens come to the meeting, the role model is at the last meeting when, as Mr. Bowen said, there are one or two representatives from the homeowners who come out and support the project. She indicated that she is in full support of the project. Commissioner O'Connor moved to: 1. find that the conditions described in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162 have not occurred as described in the Addendum to the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) and that the previously prepared SEIR, including the adopted CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, the Addendum to the SEIR, and the memo to the Addendum are adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for this project and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA; 2. find that the proposed PUD Major Modification (P15-0170) to amend City Council Ordinance No. 2030 to modify the required minimum density of 30 dwelling units per acre to a density of 15.9 dwelling units per acre for the project side and, the PUD Development Plan (PUD-81-30-89D) for the construction of a 94-unit condominium development and related on-site improvements, are consistent with the General Plan; 3. find that the proposed PID Major Modification (PUD-81-30-55M) to modify the Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines to modify the minimum and maximum density from 30 dwelling units per acre for the project site to a density of 15.9 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the General Plan; 4. find that the proposed amendment to the Development Agreement (P15-0169) is consistent with the General Plan; 5. make the PUD findings for the proposed Development Plan (PUD-81-30-89D) as listed in the staff report; 6. find that the exceptions to the Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines, as listed in the staff report, are appropriate; and 7. recommend approval of Cases P15-0170 (PUD Major Modification to amend City Council Ordinance No. 2030), PUD-81-30-89D (PUD Development Plan), PUD-81-30-55M (Major Modification to modify the Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines), and P15-0169 (amendment to the Development Agreement) to the City Council. Commissioner Piper seconded the motion. EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, May 13, 2015 Page 5 of 6