My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:30 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
density reduction request, both parcels, when developed with residential units, would <br /> have compatible densities. <br /> o Exceptions Requested by Applicant <br /> The project conforms to most of the Standards and Guidelines. The applicant is <br /> requesting the following exceptions to the Standards and Guidelines. For the <br /> Commission's reference, the page and section number for each item below is noted in <br /> italics. <br /> 1. Front Yard Setback (page 20, Design Guideline A4.2.) — Front setbacks shall be a <br /> minimum 8 feet from the back of sidewalk providing enough room for planting and <br /> privacy while still allowing a strong relationship between the units and street. <br /> Buildings 9 and 16 would not comply with the front yard setback requirements in the <br /> Standards and Guidelines. Specifically, the northern end of Building 9 would the <br /> located 4'-6" from the back of the sidewalk, and the eastern end of Building 9 would <br /> be located 7' from the back of the sidewalk. Building 16 would be located 5' from the <br /> back of the sidewalk. <br /> Comments: The front yard exception is requested for Buildings 9 and 16 fronting <br /> internal streets The northern end of Building 9 would be located 9'-6" from the face <br /> of curb on the north side and 12 feet from the face of the curb on the east side. <br /> Building 16 would be located 10 feet from the face of curb. Staff finds that proposed <br /> setbacks would provide enough separation between the units and the street. <br /> Therefore, staff can support this exception. <br /> 2. Building Orientation (page 14, Design Guidelines A2.c) — On residential frontage <br /> including public streets, internal streets, pedestrian walks/paseos, and open spaces, <br /> a minimum of 75% of building fagade should be fronted with livable residential <br /> space, i.e. not garages. <br /> Building 12 has garages fronting the street and do not meet the 75% requirement. <br /> Comments: Building 12 is a two-story, two-unit building. Given that it is a two-unit <br /> building contains only two garages, and given that the remaining buildings along this <br /> street meet this building orientation requirement, staff is able to support this <br /> exception. <br /> 3. Building Separation (page 23, Standard A6.1 Paseo) -- A 25-30 foot minimum <br /> building-to-building separation is required for residential buildings along paseos. <br /> Comment: Buildings 4 through 7 face a paseo. As the building walls are alternately <br /> recessed and projected, the walls of the middle two units of Buildings 4 and 5 would <br /> have a 21-foot separation. A similar situation occurs at Buildings 6 and 7. The <br /> areas that need the exception are located on the upper level of the buildings and the <br /> amount of encroaching building is limited (approximately 12% of Buildings 4 and 5 <br /> and approximately 14% of Buildings 6 and 7). In addition, the spacious central <br /> Summerhill Housing Group Planning Commission <br /> Page 12 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.