My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:30 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The applicant is requesting an amendment to the previously approved Development <br /> Agreement to reflect the current proposal. The Development Agreement process requires that <br /> the Planning Commission provide a recommendation to the City Council for action. Staff <br /> supports the proposed development agreement and believes that the Planning Commission <br /> should provide a positive recommendation to the City Council. The Draft amendment to the <br /> previously approved Development Agreement is attached as Exhibit B. <br /> 6. Growth Management <br /> In March 2014, the City Council approved a Growth Management Agreement for the then <br /> proposed 177-unit apartment development. As stated in Section 17.36.100 of the Pleasanton <br /> Municipal Code, a modified project that has already been granted allocations can keep those <br /> older allocations. Therefore, no new growth management is needed for the current proposal. <br /> Regional Housing Needs Allocations (RHNA). California Code Section 65863 states that <br /> each city shall ensure its housing element inventory described in its housing element program <br /> to make sites available to accommodate its share of the regional housing need throughout the <br /> planning period. In February 2015, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment to <br /> adopt the 2015-2023 General Plan Housing Element. As part of the Housing Element update, <br /> State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) continues to require each <br /> city to demonstrate capacity to meet its revised RHNA affordable housing obligations. Per <br /> HCD guidelines, vacant/underutilized sites with a density of 30 units per acre or greater are <br /> considered inventory for the construction of very low- and low-income housing; permitted and <br /> approved sites with a density of 30 units per acre or greater are considered inventory for the <br /> construction of moderate-income housing; and lower density single-family residential sites are <br /> considered inventory for the above moderate-income category. <br /> The following table shows the estimated current site capacity City-wide. <br /> Table 1: Estimated Current Ca acity <br /> Very Above <br /> Income Levels Low Low Moderate Moderate Total <br /> Income Income Income Income <br /> Estimated Capacity <br /> o Permitted and <br /> Approved Projects 279 1,527 174 1,980 <br /> o Vacant and 991 - 272 1,263 <br /> Underutilized Land <br /> Total 1,270 1,527 446 3,243 <br /> 2014-2022 RHNA 1,107 407 553 2,067 <br /> RHNA Surplus/Shortfall +163 +1,120 -107 +1,176 <br /> 'The Permitted and Approved Projects include the prior apartment project. <br /> Summerhill Housing Group Planning Commission <br /> Page 20 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.