My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 3:38:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 9-16
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Maria Hoey <br /> Subject: FW: Greenbriar Development Plan <br /> From: Emily Patterson <br /> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 9:39 AM <br /> To: Marion Pavan <br /> Cc: Phyllis Ho <br /> Subject: Greenbriar Development Plan <br /> Dear Ms. Pavan, <br /> I am a Bridle Creek resident of 8 years and am writing in support of Option #1 with respect to the Greenbriar <br /> Development plan traffic access plan. <br /> Unfortunately, I am not able to attend the meeting tonight but would echo the following points; <br /> 1. Option#1, the Greenbriar development plan, which has traffic access to and from the Lund <br /> Ranch II site only via Independence Road/Lund Ranch Road, is clearly the Environmentally <br /> Superior Alternative with the least amount of environmental impacts. <br /> 2. One of the project objectives of the Greenbriar development plan is to implement a project <br /> design that complies with all the provisions of Measure PP, preserving the hillsides and ridgelines of <br /> the community. <br /> 3. Option#1 and Option#2 (access via Independence Road/Lund Ranch Road and Middleton <br /> Place ) are the only access routes that do not violate Measure PP, the hillside initiative passed by the <br /> voters of Pleasanton . <br /> 4. The long-term traffic increases on the local neighborhood streets of Option#1 were found to <br /> be "less than significant". <br /> 5. Option#1, which does not cross the creek, is the superior plan in the area of biological <br /> resources. <br /> 6. Option #1 is the superior plan in the area of water quality. <br /> 7. Option #1 produces less traffic noise to neighborhoods adjoining the project site as compared <br /> to the other alternatives <br /> 8. Option#1 has less geological and soils impacts since it eliminates grading for roadway <br /> construction on hillside slopes exceeding 25%. <br /> As a resident of the Bridal Creek neighborhood we have noticed that access is already extremely restricted to <br /> one main point onto Sunol Boulevard. There was an accident on Sycamore Road last year and it shut down the <br /> entire neighborhood. Please consider the families that reside in our quiet neighborhood before this massive <br /> development project. <br /> Also, it is our belief that the City must follow the voice of the people and the provisions set forth in Measure <br /> PP. Please do not approve a plan that violates PP! <br /> Thank you, <br /> Emily & Travis Patterson <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.