Laserfiche WebLink
Maria Hoe)/ <br /> Subject: FW: Greenbriar Development Plan - road access <br /> • <br /> From: Tim Chu <br /> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 12:22 PM <br /> To: Marion Pavan <br /> Subject: Greenbriar Development Plan - road access <br /> Dear City Planner Pavan, <br /> I intend to attend the Planning Commission meeting this evening, but in case I am unable to make it back in time, I wanted <br /> to share my thoughts with you via email. <br /> I live in Sycamore Heights with my wife and 3 children, and our community is against any additional traffic coming down <br /> our streets. The Greenbriar development plan, which has traffic access to and from the Lund Ranch II site only via <br /> Independence Road/Lund Ranch Road is clearly the environmentally superior alternative with the least amount of <br /> environmental impact. One of the project objectives of the Greenbriar development plan is to implement a project design <br /> that complies with all the provisions of Measure PP, preserving the hillsides and ridgelines of the community <br /> Access via Independence Road/Lund Ranch Road and Middleton Place are the only access routes that do not <br /> violate Measure PP,the hillside initiative passed by the voters of Pleasanton . It has less geological and soils <br /> impacts since it eliminates grading for roadway construction on hillside slopes exceeding 25%. <br /> Additionally the long-term traffic increases on the local neighborhood streets of Independence/Lund Ranch & Middleton <br /> were found to be"less than significant". This option also does not cross the creek, and is the superior plan in the area of <br /> biological resources and water quality. <br /> It is our belief that the City must follow the voice of the people and the provisions set forth in Measure PP. Please do not <br /> approve a plan that violates PP! <br /> Thank you for your attention to this matter, <br /> Timothy Chu <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> 1 <br />