Laserfiche WebLink
® Below is the grading map from figure 6 of the Workshop Staff report marked in red with <br /> the areas greater than 25%(only in the areas proposed for development or grading) and <br /> showing the ridges in yellow near the proposed development area. <br /> PRELIMINARY GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN FIGURE 3-7 <br /> nnca•TEt3T pcTgx .. }.,... <br /> ..,....g�4 isi I °I9IT <br /> .. 1 n N_A'A 9Rt'.IIVtl_Di ,r <br /> �;. ,-..T- 1 . <br /> ^t ` et � <br /> �,, j !EDIDI,._.DD R co�e- <br /> OR69A wa eb.l � , /i�\ <br /> ry.‘ � <br /> E g <br /> Bmx ry <br /> ......clirlearl1/4 .74 1 H-10---1-4,V 1 :r's'. es' <br /> f '"� �C�i"si... i, 7 \ �iM, l t�,y.t�"'j^ Y.".. `V` DITeM,... <br /> ® by ,..--., z \/\mss <br /> -.,. r±Q/ Jam\ <br /> r >:F <br /> m <br /> 0 Lrwn Rat ,II�—_.._�___._.__—.—__.__. ---_ s,,.,,.u,ce,r.i,•n..n,.m.,.,,..,:nm <br /> Given that a significant number of the proposed lots are not in compliance with PP, it <br /> would appear this development proposal requires significant modification in order to be <br /> considered. <br /> Other Jurisdictions: <br /> The Commission asked Staff to review how other jurisdictions measure slope and ridges <br /> to see if Pleasanton's proposals were consistent with how this problem was addressed by <br /> others. I did a survey in March and provided Staff with the results for slope and ridge <br /> definitions. <br /> For slope definition, most agencies are looking for average slope for an entire parcel to <br /> determine potential development density (an example is San Ramon). This methodology <br /> isn't applicable for Pleasanton because we are interested in areas buildable within a <br /> parcel. For those agencies specifically limiting development areas because of slope <br /> within a parcel, I found many agencies which used 40' runs (as I have suggested), 80' <br /> runs or 100' runs (San Diego, Pasadena to name two). I did not find anyone using a <br />