11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Adam Weinstein From: KRISTI MAY ® Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 12:59 PM To: Adam Weinstein Subject: Lund Ranch 2 Mr Weinstein, We have lived in the Mission Hills neighborhood since 1989 and would like to have our input on Lund Ranch II considered.We are in favor of supporting the promises made by Pleasanton to it's residents, and if this needs to be built, that it go through Sycamore Creek for access. Some of the following is copied from others,but totally shares my opinion: 1. At the end of Sycamore Creek there's a sign that reads "Future Extension of Sycamore Creek Way". At the end of Lunch Ranch Road, there's simply a gate with no sign indicating a future extension. 2. Junipero, Independence and Lund Ranch neighborhoods were told 25 years ago (when they bought those properties) that Lund Ranch Road would NOT be extended. 3. If you look at an ariel view of the neighborhoods, the proposed new development is a straight shot over Sycamore Creek Way from Sunol Blvd. The Junipero/Independence/Lund/ route (in comparison) is a total maze and makes no sense. 4. Sycamore Creek Way residents were apparently told (when they purchased their homes) that the road would potentially be extended. If the developer did not tell them this or told them something different, that is not Pleasanton's fault. Anyone who buys a home knows they can not believe what a developer tells then and that you must do your own research on a neighborhood. 5. When Sycamore Creek was built, the road was built to accomodate this traffic and is very wide and the houses are set back significanity from the road. 4111. On Junipero that winds by Mission Hills park where small children play every day, the road is narrow and the houses are set very close to the road. This has become a significant cut through with the extension of Valley. Intentionally planning on putting more traffic through this neighborhood makes no sense. I walk both of these neighborhoods all of the time and the difference in traffic and comfort is significant. 7. I *with obviously most of Pleasanton), voted for PP. We all wanted to protect Pleasantons beauty. This is now being interpreted in a way to protect peoples individual self interests. I don't live right by this immediate area, so don't really have a vested interest. But I feel I have to stand up for my Pleasanton neighbors and say that they are being taken advantage of. If we can't trust our city, who can we trust? Please do the right thing and keep the promises that were made and make this right for Pleasanton. Thank you! Kristi May Accounting Services Representing PBWC 5833 San Juan Way Pleasanton,Ca. 94566 925-417-0821 Office 510-473-3729 Fax kristimav(iobwc.org III 1