Laserfiche WebLink
drawing to he accurate, the base of the tree would have been 15' higher which is certainly <br /> not possible without excavating the tree. Instead, the much more likely original slope <br /> probably is much closer to the slope shown in red in the Staff report. That drawing has <br /> ® the original slope of more than 25%(much of it greater than 35%) from the barn area <br /> 150' up the slope. <br /> Figure 11: Existing Barn <br /> ■ 14 I Tr r 4�ll <br /> �7 <br /> i� n, QaYi'r"' ° @f- C� l"1bi 1t�b�t t <br /> Ap. ��Ynl nn+ <br /> .il, x <br /> i kF taff suggested orig n u a <br /> P t lY-a ry 1 41 <br /> b t <br /> 77--- ra <br /> i <br /> i ^4J. 1 tjtw YMYM asrtL'4" *fir 4 if._ <br /> . "5 y " W <br /> M lQl .1 *4-HIT 4} <br /> The area affected by this error includes at least 4 lots and the road. To be in compliance <br /> with PP, these lots must be removed and the road relocated, potentially impacting other <br /> lots. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> The voters enacted Measure PP because of inaction to protect the hills. The Commission <br /> and the Council should respect that vote and not take actions on this project which <br /> curtails the effectiveness of PP in the future. <br /> Sincerely <br /> Allen Roberts <br />