Laserfiche WebLink
When we brought the first floor design review topic back to Council last November for <br /> consideration of whether they wanted to pursue it, their direction was to initiate a Code <br /> amendment that would only apply to historic homes in the Downtown Specific Plan <br /> Area. So that is what we are bringing back for consideration. As drafted, the Code <br /> Amendment would apply to single-family homes in residential zoning districts in the <br /> Downtown Specific Plan Area that are considered "historic resources" per the January <br /> 2014 definition approved by Council. As drafted, the Code Amendment would apply to <br /> changes anywhere on the exterior of the house (first floor, second floor, or <br /> roof). Regarding the exact exterior changes that would trigger design review,we are <br /> providing a couple of options for the Planning Commission to consider(which is what <br /> the Council directed us to do). More details will be provided in the Planning <br /> Commission staff report which will be available Friday afternoon. I will send you a copy <br /> when it's available. <br /> Also, regarding your request on the historic neighborhood sign, we are evaluating the <br /> request and will get back to you soon with a response. <br /> Steve <br /> From: Linda Garbarino <br /> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 9:31 AM <br /> To: Steve Otto <br /> Subject: Question about Proposed Municipal Code <br /> Good Morning, Steve, <br /> In reviewing the card sent from the city regarding the Planning Commission <br /> meeting set for October 14 describing a proposed municipal code to expand <br /> design review authority to include the first floor of historic homes in residential <br /> areas within the DSP, I have questions about those homes that appear to be in <br /> different categories now by merit of the historic survey findings. The use of the <br /> term "historic" is confusing with regard to which single story homes will be <br /> protected. <br /> My question: How is this proposed code language different from the goal to <br /> implement a design review for the first ten feet of all homes in the DSP built <br /> before 1942 regardless if they were one of the 87 homes found to retain their <br /> historic integrity? <br /> I am confused about this as the 87 historic homes on the survey would have <br /> protection for the entire home, single of two story, based on their designation as <br /> historic through the application of the Secretary of Interior Standards. Do we need <br /> a separate code to protect the first floor for these 87 homes if only one story? <br /> What is in place through the city to protect heritage homes in our historic <br /> neighborhoods that are next to and in between those 87 historic homes? The <br /> homes that did not qualify for the historic designation need to be protected in <br /> order for the 87 homes to maintain their value and the look of the neighborhood. <br /> Thanks for your time. <br /> Linda <br /> 2 <br />