My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2015 12:58:41 PM
Creation date
10/28/2015 3:27:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
Document Relationships
12 ATTACHMENT 5 EXHIBIT B
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2015\110315
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
When we brought the first floor design review topic back to Council last November for <br /> consideration of whether they wanted to pursue it, their direction was to initiate a Code <br /> amendment that would only apply to historic homes in the Downtown Specific Plan <br /> Area. So that is what we are bringing back for consideration. As drafted, the Code <br /> Amendment would apply to single-family homes in residential zoning districts in the <br /> Downtown Specific Plan Area that are considered "historic resources" per the January <br /> 2014 definition approved by Council. As drafted, the Code Amendment would apply to <br /> changes anywhere on the exterior of the house (first floor, second floor, or <br /> roof). Regarding the exact exterior changes that would trigger design review,we are <br /> providing a couple of options for the Planning Commission to consider(which is what <br /> the Council directed us to do). More details will be provided in the Planning <br /> Commission staff report which will be available Friday afternoon. I will send you a copy <br /> when it's available. <br /> Also, regarding your request on the historic neighborhood sign, we are evaluating the <br /> request and will get back to you soon with a response. <br /> Steve <br /> From: Linda Garbarino <br /> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 9:31 AM <br /> To: Steve Otto <br /> Subject: Question about Proposed Municipal Code <br /> Good Morning, Steve, <br /> In reviewing the card sent from the city regarding the Planning Commission <br /> meeting set for October 14 describing a proposed municipal code to expand <br /> design review authority to include the first floor of historic homes in residential <br /> areas within the DSP, I have questions about those homes that appear to be in <br /> different categories now by merit of the historic survey findings. The use of the <br /> term "historic" is confusing with regard to which single story homes will be <br /> protected. <br /> My question: How is this proposed code language different from the goal to <br /> implement a design review for the first ten feet of all homes in the DSP built <br /> before 1942 regardless if they were one of the 87 homes found to retain their <br /> historic integrity? <br /> I am confused about this as the 87 historic homes on the survey would have <br /> protection for the entire home, single of two story, based on their designation as <br /> historic through the application of the Secretary of Interior Standards. Do we need <br /> a separate code to protect the first floor for these 87 homes if only one story? <br /> What is in place through the city to protect heritage homes in our historic <br /> neighborhoods that are next to and in between those 87 historic homes? The <br /> homes that did not qualify for the historic designation need to be protected in <br /> order for the 87 homes to maintain their value and the look of the neighborhood. <br /> Thanks for your time. <br /> Linda <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.