My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:08:00 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:24:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
Document Relationships
07 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 6 <br />Continued from August 10, 2016: <br />P16 -1201, PUD -120, Tract 8326, Catalyst Development Partners <br />Applications for: (1) Rezoning of three parcels totaling approximately <br />31,798 square feet at 536 and 550 St. John Street and an adjacent vacant parcel <br />from RM -1,500 (Multi Family Residential) to PUD -HDR (Planned Unit Development <br />— High Density Residential) District; (2) PUD Development Plan approval to retain <br />and relocate the existing single - family residence on -site and construct 10 two - <br />story townhomes and related site improvements; and (3) Vesting Tentative Map <br />approval to subdivide the three parcels into 11 residential parcels. Zoning for the <br />properties is RM -1,500 (Multi Family Residential) which is within the Core Area <br />Overlay District. <br />Steve Otto presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key elements <br />of the proposal. <br />Noted Present: <br />Chair Ritter was noted present at 6:47 p.m. and Commissioner O'Connor was noted <br />present at 6:53 p.m. <br />Commissioner Nagler: On the setbacks, if we were to desire greater setbacks on St. <br />John Street, what would be the potential impacts of creating extra space on the street? <br />Otto: Assuming all things remain the same as far as sizes and shapes of the units, if <br />you wanted to increase setbacks here you would have to shift everything south so you <br />would be shortening the setbacks in the rear. One thing I didn't mention in the <br />presentation, this street has a separated sidewalk so there is a five -foot sidewalk then <br />eight feet before the front curb, so that helps reduce the perceived setback of the units <br />as well. <br />Beaudin: There is the possibility of changing the unit dimensions as well, if you're <br />looking at all the scenarios. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Just one more question on this. In your work with the applicant, I <br />imagine you spent time discussing the setbacks, right, around the property, particularly <br />in the front? And the setbacks as they are proposed on the street, the planning <br />perspective was this is the optimum outcome for the project? <br />Beaudin: Yes, the answer is yes. We did look at the setbacks. We're trying to get <br />houses close to the street but not overwhelming the street. They are two stories tall <br />which is different from some of the other products in the downtown and with the front <br />porch additions it seems like the kind of walkable downtown environment we're trying to <br />create, is facilitated by these types of setbacks. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Okay. <br />Weinstein: Yeah, if you walk down St. John Street on a nice summer's night like maybe <br />tonight and you look at the townhouse project across the street that Steve talked about, <br />you often find that the folks who live there, at least in the units facing St. John Street, <br />EXCERPT: DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 24, 2016 Page 1 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.